Necessity Of Custody Review System

With the continuous development of social science and technology, science andtechnology is increasingly used in the litigation, and the role has become increasinglyimportant in the criminal proceedings. Due to the limited nature of the knowledge ofthe judge and the parties, such litigation is difficult to accurately understand and graspthe scientific evidence, and also makes it an effective cross-examination in Criminal.Forensic system established in China in order to solve specialized problems in thecase, but in a specific use, its shortcomings have gradually manifested. In order tomake up for the lack of identification system and better safeguard the rights of theparties, also introduced in criminal proceedings "expertise" that assisted people theconcept of academic experts said, but it is not difficult to see that the Code ofCriminal Procedure and related judicial interpretations on expert-assisted the peoplesystem requirements too principles and slipshod in actual use will inevitably bringmany problems. Improve the Criminal System of Expert, the promotion of the courseof justice in our country, safeguard social justice has a very important significance.Divided into four chapters, totaling more than30,000words.The first chapter of research ideas, and made a presentation on the domesticstatus quo, and also explains the research method, and the innovation of this paper.The second chapter describes the basic theory of the Criminal Auxiliary ExpertCriminal experts auxiliary concept and status as well as the value of its existence.Preliminary introduction to this chapter of the Criminal Auxiliary Expert system.The third chapter describes the relevant foreign System of Expert. In this partmainly introduces the technical advisory system in Italy, Russia expert system,assessor system in Japan. As well as evaluating the introduction of the system,compare the similarities and differences of the system in the three countries, andestablish the Criminal System of Expert on China to provide references.The fourth chapter discusses the legislative status quo of China’s CriminalSystem of Expert and problems, and by the analysis of these issues, which putforward ideas for improvement.