The Construction And Research Of Administration Accountability System In China

In recent years, with the accelerating process of China’s legal system, thedevelopment of network technology and the advent of information technology, thedegree of openness of government at all levels and openness of the overwhelmingimpact. In particular, some social event of unexpected incidents, people on how toimplement the administrative accountability of the degree of concern. China’sadministrative accountability gradually shift from the power of accountability to thelegal accountability. Typical examples of administrative accountability is alsoincreasing. The term of the administrative accountability is also widespread in thepublic eye and speech. Premier Wen Jiabao in the national administration in themeeting held in2010specifically to produce sound administrative accountabilitysystem, and proposed administrative accountability legislation. However, becauseChina is still a lack of operable laws and regulations, cause there are many problemsin the practical work of the implementation of administrative accountability, inparticular the existence of the subject and the object of administrative accountabilityis not clear accountability procedures less standardized, and the implementation ofaccountability not in place and other issues. Therefore, to achieve theinstitutionalization of administrative accountability, procedures and the rule of law,we need to continue to study and explore.After reading a lot of literature, combined with recent years, the case of theadministrative accountability, on the basis of the analysis of meaning and theory ofadministrative accountability, try the issue of China’s administrative system ofaccountability from the perspective of law, sociology and other analysis to investigatean attempt on the basis of previous research results and learn from some successfulexperience in the administrative accountability at home and abroad, and in recentyears, the introduction of policies and regulations and social practice, analyze thesituation and problems, and propose recommendations to improve administrative accountability. Divided into four parts: in the introduction, the paper analyzes thebackground, the value and significance of the implementation of administrativeaccountability, the need for the implementation of administrative accountability, andthe status of the comb at home and abroad on the study of administrativeaccountability, which leads to writing the reason gradually clear this research ideasand methods. The second part, the basic meaning and theoretical basis of theadministrative accountability system described in the results of the object of a clearadministrative accountability, administrative accountability, the scope ofadministrative accountability procedures, the case of administrative accountability,administrative accountability, administrative accountability significance, and soon. The third part of the administrative accountability main issues: unclear andoverlapping functions, the main responsibility is not clear; the same bodyaccountability, the allergenic accountability is relatively weak; accountability toonarrow in scope; administrative accountability The legal system is imperfect; not astrong culture of accountability. And problems of the reasons discussed in detail. Thefourth part, the improvement of the administrative accountability system to find thepath, and provide some valuable rationalization proposals. The fifth part, to draw theconclusions of the full text.