| October Revolution as the Big Dipper of Political universe (from Hobsbawm),represents a new generation of political history map. But with the collapse of the SovietUnion, as Capitalist development to post-industrial society, its industry structure, sociallife, communication, art forms and artistic styles and even ideologies have undergonegreat changes, thus capitalist ideology "historical eschatology" rhetoric began to spreadmedia world. Derrida’s deconstruction to create a text or text notation, on the one hand,deconstruction dismantling capitalism Messiah argument, softened its internal tension,constructed a " hauntology " Perspective of the radical Marxist image, but on the otherhand, the understanding of Marxist philosophy have been deconstructed as a "multipleheterogeneous" discrete-like state.Derrida denies the possibility of unity in the understanding of Marxist philosophy,emphasize the absolute diversity. This article attempts to explain this issue through theperspective of hermeneutics. From the rational point of view, the first reason is thecontext of historical change, including changes of the historical development ofcapitalism, the conversion revolutionary path, the world s multicolor tendencies. Theother main difference is the occasion that a pluralistic understanding of the subjectbefore the understanding of the structure, through the process of diversification quizproblem domain, and ultimately the formation of a wide range of answer system. Thethird reason is the difference in the relationship of dialogue, there are three mode ofunderstanding, the first emphasizes object-centric, the second emphasizes thesubject-centric, the third method of deconstruction. But further advance the logic foundin the understanding of Marxist philosophy still has its inherent unity, including:globalization is reflected in one of the new extension of the logic of capital, the historical task of the conversion, while still maintaining the inherent unity, worldintegration trend, and the other as a pluralistic understanding of the main differences ofunderstanding, as the threshold, its inherent theoretical horizon are integral to thefusion of critical dimensions and constructive dimension consisting of double vision,which is the unity of the three from the text of the intermediary, understanding of theobjectives of the historic unity of understanding and practice-oriented representation.Thus, diversity and unity, constitutes a kind of state the existence of contemporaryMarxist philosophy, and who understand the performance of Marxist philosophy forunderstanding text is relative and absolute unity of the historical dialectic movement. |