Font Size: a A A

Roles Of STIM1and STIM2in The CaR Mediated Ca2+ Entry And NO Generation And Its Mechanisms In Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

Posted on:2014-10-29Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:H ZhaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2254330401483244Subject:Pathology and pathophysiology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective: To study the role of calcium sensor stromal interaction molecules (STIM1、2)in extracellularCa2+-sensing receptor (CaR)-induced extracellular Ca2+influx and the production of nitric oxide (NO), andits mechanisms in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC).Methods:(1) HUVEC were cultured using trypsinzation method and identified by growth pattern andimmunofluorescent staining.(2) The second to fifth passage of HUVEC were randomly divided into:①Control group;②CaR agonist group (spermine+Ca2+);③SOC inhibitor groups(MRS1845/Gd3+/2-APB/SKF-9636+spermine+Ca2+);④ROC inhibitor groups(Ro31-8220/Go6976+spermine+Ca2+);⑤ROC inhibitor+ROC agonist groups(Ro31-8220/Go6976+TPA+spermine+Ca2+);⑥ROC+SOC inhibitor groups(MRS1845+Ro31-8220/Go6976+spermine+Ca2+);⑦STIM1shRNA groups: the untransfected group(control group); interference groups: shSTIM1-002group, shSTIM1-003group, shSTIM1-004group;vehicle group;⑧STIM2shRNA groups: the untransfected group (control group); interference groups:shSTIM2-001group, shSTIM2-002group, shSTIM2-003group; vehicle group. STIM1/STIM2shRNAgroups were incubated with CaR agonist spermine (activating ROC and SOC), ROC analog TPA andnegative allosteric modulator of CaR Calhex231(activating ROC, blocking SOC), PKC inhibitorRo31-8220and classic-type PKCs and PKCμ inhibitor Go6976(activating SOC, blocking ROC),respectively.(3) The shRNA specifically targeted to STIM1/STIM2gene were designed and synthesizedaccording to the cDNA sequence of human STIM1/STIM2gene in Genbank, shRNA were transfected into2-5HUVEC by liposome method. The transfection efficiency of STIM1/STIM2shRNA was detected bylaser scanning confocal microscopy in each group. The STIM1/STIM2proteins expression and interferenceefficiency were determined by Western blot in each group. The interference efficiencys of STIM1/STIM2mRNA were determined by Real time RT-PCR respectively.(4) The co-localization of STIM1and STIM2were determined using the immunofluorescence analysis.(5) Intracellular Ca2+concentration ([Ca2+]i) wasmeasured by Fura-2/AM loading, the production of NO were determined by the DAF-FM diacetate(DAF-FM DA).(6) The SPSS17.0was used. Data are reported as means±SE. Statistical comparisons weremade using t-test or chi-square test for the paired and the unpaired groups. An analysis of variance wasused when multiple comparisons were performed. A difference was considered significant at p<0.05.Results:(1) HUVEC were confirmed by cell morphology and immunocytochemistry measuring Ⅷ factorantigen.(2) The green/red fluorescence by fluorescence microscopy could show the successful transfectionof shRNA in HUVEC.(3) Immunocytochemical results showed that STIM1and STIM2co-localized in thecytoplasm.(4) Western blot results showed that: Compared with control group, the STIM1and STIM2protein levels in each group were not considered significant,respectively (P>0.05).(5) In STIM1/STIM2shRNA groups, Western blot results demonstrated that: Compared with control group, Vehicle group wasnot considered significant (P>0.05); shRNA targeted to the STIM1specifically decreased the expression ofSTIM1protein in shSTIM1-002, shSTIM1-003and shSTIM1-004group (the interference efficiency was 43%,50%,74%, respectively)48h after transfection (P<0.05), especially the shSTIM1-004group(P<0.05);shRNA targeted to the STIM2specifically decreased the expression of STIM2protein in shSTIM2-001,shSTIM2-002and shSTIM2-003group (the interference efficiency was44%,80%,30%, respectively)48hafter transfection (P<0.05), especially the ShSTIM2-002group (P<0.05).(6) Real time RT-PCR resultsshowed that: Compared with control group, Vehicle group was not considered significant (P>0.05);shSTIM1-002, shSTIM1-003and shSTIM1-004(the interference efficiency was56%,73%,91%,respectively) targeted to the STIM1specifically decreased the gene of STIM1(P<0.05), especially theshSTIM1-004group (P<0.05); shSTIM2-001, shSTIM2-002and shSTIM2-003(the interference efficiencywas80%,88%,41%, respectively) targeted to the STIM2specifically decreased the gene of STIM2(P<0.05), especially the shSTIM2-002(P<0.05).(7) The results of dynamic changes of intracellular Ca2+fluorescence intensity ratio in HUVEC by Fura-2/AM showed that: Compared with the control group (CaRagonist group, spermine+Ca2+group)(Δratio=5.84±0.10) and vehicle group (Δratio=5.80±0.05), the [Ca2+]iof shSTIM1-004Group (Δratio=4.60±0.18) was decreased (p<0.05), the [Ca2+]iof shSTIM2-002group(Δratio=5.75±0.13) was not changed (p>0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was nosignificant difference (p>0.05). Compared with the control group (Calhex231+OAG+spermine+Ca2+group)(Δratio=2.79±0.04) and vehicle group (Δratio=2.91±0.18), the [Ca2+]iof shSTIM1-004Group(Δratio=1.09±0.02) was decreased (p<0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was nosignificant difference (p>0.05). Compared with the control group (Ro31-8220+spermine+Ca2+)(Δratio=3.15±0.10) and vehicle group (Δratio=2.90±0.08), the [Ca2+]iof shSTIM1-004group(Δratio=1.15±0.02) was decreased (p<0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was nosignificant difference (p>0.05). Compared with the control group (Go6976+spermine+Ca2+group)(Δratio=4.26±0.04) and vehicle group (Δratio=4.17±0.14), the [Ca2+]iof shSTIM1-004Group(Δratio=1.21±0.07) was decreased (p<0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was nosignificant difference (p>0.05).(8) The results of net NO fluorescence intensity by DAF-FM DA showedthat: Compared with the control group (CaR agonist group, spermine+Ca2+group)(1105.18±31.97) andvehicle group (983.33±30.33), the net NO fluorescence intensity of shSTIM1-004group (160.08±11.12)was diminished (p<0.05), the net NO fluorescence intensity of shSTIM2-002group (1035.80±27.78) wasno significant difference (p>0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was no significantdifference (p>0.05). Compared with the control group (Calhex231+OAG+spermine+Ca2+group)(177.17±20.09) and vehicle group (179.92±16.82), the net NO fluorescence intensity of shSTIM1-004group (59.83±7.43) was diminished (p<0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was nosignificant difference (p>0.05). Compared with the control group (Ro31-8220+spermine+Ca2+)(182.66±11.93) and Vehicle group (175.52±31.64), the net NO fluorescence intensity of shSTIM1-004group (56.27±5.71) was diminished (p<0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was nosignificant difference (p>0.05). Compared with the control group (Go6976+spermine+Ca2+group)(201.43±7.48) and vehicle group (188.19±19.77), the net NO fluorescence intensity of shSTIM1-004group(56.06±7.71) was diminished (p<0.05), compared with the control group, vehicle group was no significant difference (p>0.05).Conclusion:(1) STIM1plays an important role in CaR-mediating Ca2+influx and NO production inHUVEC.(2) STIM1is a key component in CaR-mediated Ca2+influx and NO production though SOC andROC. STIM2does not participate in this processes.
Keywords/Search Tags:calcium sensor stromal interaction molecule1, calcium sensor stromal interaction molecule2, Human umbilical vein endothelial cells, calcium-sensing receptors, calcium signaling, nitric oxide
PDF Full Text Request
Related items