Prospective Memory Tap Effect In The Application Of Directional Cross-country Teaching Research

This study investigates the individuals of different directional cross-country testunder the event-based prospective memory performance differences, on the premiseof directional cross-country test whether any Transfer Appropriate Processing effectsof prospective memory (Transfer Appropriate Processing Effect, TAP Effect for short)and find out the prospective memory Transfer Appropriate Processing Effect anddirectional cross-country performance, then applied to the teaching of directionalcross-country, poor performance in purpose is to help individuals, the directionalcross-country achievement has the certain progress. In this study are in line with theprinciple of random selection of subjects for directional cross-country test andprospective memory transfer appropriate processing experiment.In this article, the integrated use of various research methods of directionalcross-country movement and TAP effect in prospective memory related theoryresearch. First through the literature material law, from the library electronic readingroom and consulting a large number of prospective memory and directionalcross-country data and valid data, based on the research of a large number of contrastanalysis, summed up the essence of predecessors’ research results, and find out thedefects and problems existing in the research, based on the summary of the law to findinnovative and breakthrough. So combining directional cross-country, prospectivememory research put forward problems and to propose solutions through practice,using the experimental method to design reasonable and scientific experiments, usingmathematical statistics to analyze the experimental results. Finally concluded,according to the experiment on the subjects of the poor performance in directionaldirectional cross-country the design of teaching methods, a directional cross-countrycomparison teaching experiments, to verify that the teaching effect.Research results show that:1.In the event-based prospective memory task, the task processing types inprospective memory performance, directional high grades or poor or invalid subjects,their prospective memory performance similar, difference is not significant. Task processing types inconsistent, directional highest scores of prospective memoryperformance, directional results invalid the set times, poor performance in directionalinconsistent worst prospective memory performance, significant difference. Threegroups of subjects are all task types in prospective memory performance is higherthan the task type inconsistent results.2. In the event-based prospective memory task, on the task and prospective memorytask processing types is consistent, no significant grade differences between boys andgirls, in the two types of task processing is not consistent when the two kinds of menand women was test result is not significant difference. Boys and girls in prospectivememory and task processing type of prospective memory scores were higher than thescores in the inconsistent, but are not significant.3. Prospective memory processing task is perceptual processing, according to thegrouping of directional cross-country distance directional performance scores, gradesin subjects with poor task processing type of prospective memory scores were higherthan the scores in the inconsistent, significant difference, so the two groups have TAPeffect in prospective memory. Results compared with poor scores increased the TAPeffect in prospective memory. Result is invalid when a group of subjects taskconsistent results is greater than the inconsistent results, but not significant, so no TAPeffect, the result is invalid participants to a certain extent offset by appropriatemigration effects of prospective memory.