| The16th world basketball championships were over. China won one game andfailed five.16rankings. It was the worst record in32years. Compared with them,China had many problems to be further analysis. In this competition, China facedEuropean team, the offensive relatively smooth, but the defensive loopholes.Technology and tactics exposed many problems, particularly to Turkish, and big scoredefeat. Therefore, the study of the world championships between China and theEuropean about the defensive tactics of ability, try my best to find out the gapbetween the European team. It was important to improve the level of skill and tacticsof the Chinese men’s basketball team.This article were through the questionnaire survey and then determine thedirectly affect of the defensive tactics index. Detailed analysis of the specificdefensive each link, the qualitative and quantitative evaluation to determine the resultsand comparative analysis to science, and find out the gap between Chinese men’sbasketball team and European team. Offer Suggestions for future. This article throughthe literature data method, expert interview method, expert questionnaire, videoobservation statistics method, mathematical statistics method, and finally reaches thefollowing conclusions:1There was a big gap between China and European in the quality aspect in thebody. Chinese were more disadvantage in the body of quality and full.The Chineseplayers had no superiority in body against.It is one of the reasons for China of failingin this game.2In the defense technology, the ability of ball man defense, defense without theball to the ability of people relatively weak of China, but defensive rebounding wasgood. Specific to each defense technology link, the processes of defense with the ball,the defensive passing, dribbling prevention, the breakthrough performance is poorer,and defensive shots behaved well, defensive rebounding had greatly improved. 3In the defensive tactics, the base of defensive ability of China was worse, o thetimes of trapped, help and fill were less than European, and the effect was poorer.Zone defense was main used by China, half man-to-man next; it was the same asEuropean. But there was a big gap between the successful rates. Especially theperformance for the defensive tactics was singles, no flexibility, slow, unstable. It waswill always focus on individual task on good players, and unfavorable to theimplementation of the defensive tactics. European were more flexible, in addition tothe physical and mental qualities more stable, they could quickly judge and respond tothe situation, while European, the ability of rival team man-to-man was strong. Theycould break through the weak link of China. |
