The Criticism About Educational Humanization

Now, researchers recognize “Educational Humanization” mainly from two aspects. Thisarticle mainly analyzes the logical contradictions of them. This paper insisted that“Educational Humanization” is absurd.The first part, we mainly analysis that the two kinds of views about "what is the humannature?" and the different methods of “Educational Humanization” under differentassumptions. Some scholars are too much emphasis that the human nature is “intellectuality,rational and moral”. They believe that "human nature" is the fundamental difference betweenhumans and animals. And the other scholars hold that the human nature is “the naturalattributes, social attributes and mental attributes". They insisted that “human nature” is thesum of all the properties. In this paper, we believe that these two views are biased. There arecontradictions between them.The second part focuses on the logical contradictions in “intellectuality, rational andmoral”: This point of view of human nature is one-sided. Because,“What is the humannature?” and there are some similarities between humans and animals. This human natureassumption will inevitably lead to suppress human nature in the educational activities. So,there is a trap. Then, This view of education is the same as traditional education’s approach,both from the theory and practice.The third part focuses on the logical contradictions in “the natural attributes, socialattributes and mental attributes": This point of view of human nature is also not clearly. Andthere are so many contradictions between these components about human nature. This humannature assumption caused a lot of difficulties in “Educational Humanization”. After analyze different logic about Educational Humanization, we know that each pointof this view is wrong. And these two views contradict each other. The view of "human nature"is different and changing. So “Educational Humanization” is a clear false proposition.