Analysis Of Football Bribery In Criminal Law

Since economic reform, China has made great progress in competitive sport. Asa core of Chinese competitive sports, Fair play offers athletes an impartialenvironment and made the competition glamour with valuable result. Since1994,football association had commercialized its operation. However, without a healthylaw, a regulatory system and with money oriented officials, a series of badphenomenon were carried out such as “black whistle” and “match-fixing”. This badphenomenon extremely deteriorated football games represented on wreckedprinciple of sport, chaos of sports order and violation on legal interests of hosts andfans. After all, it seriously restricts the development of Chinese football.“Match-fixing” and “black whistle” are typical forms of committing bribe infootballing, which illustrated the consequence of corruption in Chinese football, aswell as it beyond control of both internal regulatory framework and externaladministrative supervision. As supplementary and severe legal standard, Criminallaw ought to get involved in remedying football corruption. In2012, a vitalityanti-forge storm spread out in Chinese footballing. Massive personnel such asofficials, clubs, players and umpires were involved in the incident. Court of Justiceconvicted partial defendants as guilty with corresponded punishment.As the indeterminate legislation in China, it also lack of systematic experimentagainst football corruption. Judicial practise encountered various difficulties whiledealing with such issue. After all, from both administrative and legislativeperspectives, promoting Chinese football, erasing bad phenomenon is imminent byexpanding research on forms and characteristics of football corruption. Usingreference on legislative administration from developed football counties, this articleemphasizes the form of football corruption as “match-fixing” and “black whistle” interms of conceptual football bribing behaviour. It also brings forth regulatorypolicies against Chinese football corruption with following four parts.First part briefs behaviour of football corruption. This part begins withintroducing the forms of bribing, extracting concept of football bribing, followed by concentration on describing “match-fixing” and “black whistle”.The second part discussed the necessity of punishing corruptions. This partexplained the consequences of bribing as it was severe violation of competitive sportcampaign, and trial attitude. Football bribing deteriorates Chinese footballing andbetrayal the devotion of entire Chinese football fans. Frankly speaking, it isnecessary to seek legislative acts to against bribing.Thirdly, this article list the standard of conviction based on criminal law againstbribing. It separately resolved both “match-fixing” and “black whistle” convictionstandard, as well as rational analyse of each subjects in football bribing.The fourth part is prevention and penalty policies which against footballingbribe. This part starts with criminal laws against corruption from developed footballnations, bring forth how to legislatively prevent and remedy corruption of Chinesefootballing.The entire article objectively analysed the drawbacks of Chinese footballing,based on such discussion, it expects attracting legislative attention and bring solutionand sustainable environment for Chinese footballing.