An Analysis On Comments Of Noticeable Criminal Cases In China

In recent years, more and more criminal cases known to the public as publicevents, for these criminal cases rise for public events, network plays a promoting role.Mr. Li’s rampage in campus and his words “my dad is li gang”, made him famous.and this made the public anger.Yao Jiaxin was a student in Shanxi, he wasn’t famousfor his contribution to the society or his knowledge, but his knife, which he used tokill a person. The people he killed is a woman who was hurt in an accident and YaoJiaxin is the maker of the accident. He didn’t save her,but killed her with his knife.The public could forgive the accident but for his behaviour which kill a person withthe knife. Li Changkui a person who killed a girl who didn’t want to marry him.Rape,murder,killed a three years old boy.His behavior were more hateful than YaoJiaxin. Each case attracted attention of the public, and these are challenge to moral ofthe public. These case made people who heard anger. Because of its particularity andunder network public comment. Kill? Or not kill?“They must be killed!” Publicoutcried. But when they are killed, whether there will be a "Li Jiaxin" or "Yao Changkui"?This article selected more than thirty pieces of cases from the Internet in nearly adecade, emphasis more than10pieces, contains Li Changkui case such as malignantcases; Corruption cases such as Yang Dacai case; Hangzhou drag racing case, thesecond generation whose father is rich or officials; SheXiangLin, NieShuBin a seriesof grievance cases. Based on these cases and online comments are analyzed to findout the similarities, classify and comments: the generality of the review of the case inthe express public hatred for the special identity, vicious damage cases of retributionpunishment for understanding, and strongly suspect to justice. And in the case of thecomments will be the voice of the public’s irrational, these sounds in a certain extentcan cause some bad influence to justice.The reason is the lack of judicial authority,because of this judicial isvulnerable. Through the comparison and analysis, the author thinks that the judicial should voluntarily accept the supervision from the public, and judicial must dosomething to keep the bottom line of legal at the same time.