Let The "Good Intentions" No Longer Embarrassed-under The External Perspective Of The Shared Responsibility Of Favor

Altruism is the traditional Chinese virtues, this seemingly universal socialphenomenon often legal problems will be in accordance with the law, thesewell-intentioned move sometimes I’m sorry things to bring all sorts of disputes. Such an actreferred to in legal circles as a Favor. The contradiction between the starting point of theoriginal is the original intention of the good intentions, but due to negligence oroverconfident to their object to patronizing or third person to bring trouble, disputes thisproduced. Favor acts in life there are a lot, but its legal nature is not clear, the relevantresponsibility often can not be properly resolved, and even affect the harmoniousdevelopment of society. Throughout the national academic Favor relations, but also beinvolved in part of the book in the United States, Germany, Japan and Taiwan, has yet toform a more complete theoretical system. In this regard, the German civil law circlesstarted earlier, it has established a complete set of standards used to determine Favorbehavior whether a legal obligation, and thus its definition of an objective. Through thekindness patronizing behavior and contractual relations, civil behavior differences, analysisFavor of legal nature, then its likely to translate into "tort" qualitative aspects of ahypothetical legal construct and shared responsibility. The use of gathered from theacademic resources of the issue to explore, to explore and find the idea of this article tosolve the problem in the theory community on such issues among the academic point ofview, a reasonable position in the legal sense.