Analysis Of Media And Judicial Independence Unity And Opposition

This some years, with the rapid development of the news media, the news on theAuthority to curb judicial corruption, and to safeguard social fairness and justice play animportant role. Sometimes, the news media in the judicial process, there have beensome conflict and friction. Mainly in the erosion of news monitoring the independenceof the judiciary and the judiciary, news media restrictions in two ways. The news mediaand the independence of the judiciary have their own legitimacy basis. The news mediais actually an extension of the constitutional freedom of speech and the right tocriticisms and suggestions, an independent judiciary is a fundamental principle of law.The media and the court’s position in the case that standards of fairness and theoperating rules of the differences led to differences in both the evaluation findings, aThis is the root of the media monitoring confrontation with the independence of thejudiciary, as well as our country also exists in the handling of the relationship betweenmedia and judicial bias.The confrontation between the news media and judicial independence is possible toreconcile the two are unified in the constitutional sense. Unified news media and theopposition of the independence of the judiciary is conducive to safeguarding theauthority of the judiciary and promote judicial justice, to achieve both the value of.China’s actual situation analysis of deep-level mining the causes of conflict between thetwo. Coordination of the relationship between the two, I promote judicial justicemeeting point, the principle of media monitoring, media roles, media and judicialmutual tolerance and self-discipline recommendations.The first part of the basic theory of the news media and judicial independence, discussesthe concept of the news media, the concept of role, characteristics of judicialindependence, characteristics, significance.The second part of the news media and the independence of the judiciary, opposingthe status quo, by listing the five hot spots of the interference of the media trial justice cases discusses the news media of the erosion of judicial independence, at the same timediscusses China’s local authorities, local authorities, the introduction of a variety ofmeasures to restrict the news media.The third part, the opposite of the news media and judicial independence,discussed the reason for the existence in theory, the reason for the existence and practice.The fourth part of the experience of foreign countries deal with news media and judicialindependence, discusses the practice of the United States, Britain and other commonlaw and civil law countries such as Germany, France.The fifth part of the legal measures of the coordination of the news media andjudicial independence relations, the author is given from the following three aspects oflegal countermeasures: first, the establishment of the courts and the defensemechanisms of improper interference on the news media, and enhance the independenceof the judiciary itself; Second, to establish the mechanism of the constraints of the newsmedia to limit the boundaries of the news media justice; third, the establishment of acoordination mechanism of the news media and judicial independence, to achieve thepositive interaction of the news media and the administration of justice.