| Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing down global warming are theimportant tasks that every country is faced with. Developed countries think thatimported products from non-reduction countries raise the issue of “loss ofcompetiveness†and “carbon leakageâ€, therefore they propose to levy “carbontariffâ€.The American Clean Energy and Security Act was approved by the House ofRepresentatives on June,2009, which stipulates carbon tariff clause---InternationalReserve Allowance Program. Accoring to the Act, the US is entitled to impose carbontariff on energy-intensive products from countries that haven’t take effective measuresto reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect its domestice manufacturing industry.This essay analyze the legitimacy of carbon tariff under WTO combined withGATT/WTO cases and it can be divided into five parts: Part1introduces the UnitedNations Framework of Climate Change, Kyotol Protocol and European UnionDirective2003/87/EC. Part2concludes carbon tariff in essence is form of Border TaxAdjustment (BTA) and shall comply with WTO rules. Part3illustrates that carbontariff is agaist WTO basic rules(National Traeatmeng and Most-FavoredTreatment).Part4explains that the US can’t cite Article XX of GATT1994to defensefor itself. Part5analyze European Union’s carbon emission tax on airlines.Part6gives some suggestions to deal with carbon tarriff. |