Based On Dea Starting Fund Performance Evaluation Of Clinical Medicine Joint Research Project

Objective To evaluate the performance of clinical medicine and joint research projects funded by Capital Medical Development Scientific Research Fund, to analyze the causes why the projects’relative performance are good or poor, to provide reference information for managers of the fund doing scientific research management and making decisionMethods Extract related data of clinical medicine and joint research projects from the collection of the project subject "data analysis and evaluation of Capital Medical Development Scientific Research Fund", which were funded during1998to2007.The data was collected from November2011to January2012.Count7aspects of indexes of these clinical medicine and research projects, including publications papers,published in undergraduate textbooks, prize, patents, students training, the new techniques and follow-up projects.We assume one project as an evaluation unit, the grant amount as input indicator, the performance scores of seven output indicators as seven output indicators. Then we use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), software MaxDEA5.2to evaluate the relative performance of these projects. After that, in order to solve that DEA couldn’t differentiate whose performance is better among those non DEA effective projects, we use Classification of DEA to evaluate related performance of these projects by using the same inputs and outputs data, classifying different performance levels situation for these projects.Explore the possible ways to put the forward performance of non DEA efficient projects, and the output and performance distribution characteristics, by analysis of the results of the evaluation. Further analysis based on different angles are used to analyze the details of the project’s performance, respectively from the projected year, nature of institution whose employees undertook the project, the regional distribution of project grants.Results (1) The basic information of the objecting projects. From the projected years,9projects approved in1998, an average of￥800000;12project approved in1999, an average funds of￥733300;21projects approved in2002, an average of￥652400;13projects approved in2003, an average of￥500000;28projects approved in2005, an average of￥370800;32projects approved in2007, an average of￥443100project. From the distribution of regional perspective, clinical medicine and joint research projects are concentrated in Xicheng, Chaoyang, Dongcheng and Haidian, Changping, DaiXing, Fangshan, Fengtai, Shijingshan projects are few in number, the number of integrated each district projects and the performance level of distribution. From the different nature of hospitals, municipal and central hospitals assume more number of project, district, industry, military hospitals assume less.(2) The project performance score. Among115clinical medical and joint research projects, the highest scoring average on output is paper published,and the score is8.98points, the average score of student training is8.07points, average score of follow-up project works is2.99points, average score of published works is2.63points, average score of new technology is0.93points, the average score of prize obtained is0.84points, average score of patent is0.67points,which is the lowest score among scores of seven kinds of output.(3) The DEA performance evaluation results.15projects have no output in115projects.7project reach the effectiveness of DEA in100projects whose outputs are more than zero,11projects achieve the pure technology efficiency,20projects achieve the scale efficiency. The average value of comprehensive efficiency of the100projects is0.5428, the average value of the pure technical efficiency is0.6704, the average of the scale efficiency is0.7969.(4)Analyse on non DEA projects.93projects are non DEA effective. Among them,13projects achieve the scale efficiency but pure technical efficiency is not achieved,4projects to achieve the pure technical efficiency but scale efficiency is not achieved, the76projects do not achieve the pure technology efficiency and do not meet the scale efficiency, either., of which72projects are not pure technical efficiency and decreasing return to scale state. Among the93non DEA effective projects,3items are lack of output about new technology, accounting for all non-DEA effective projects3.23%.3items fall short of output about patent deficiency, accounting for all non-DEA effective projects3.23%.77items are short of output about students training deficiency, accounting for all non-DEA effective project82.80%.86items are not enough on published in undergraduate textbooks deficiency, accounting for all non-DEA effective project92.47%;90items are shortage in the subsequent bear project output deficiency, accounting for all non-DEA effective project96.77%. All93non effective projects are short of paper published and prize.(5)The DEA classification performance evaluated by improved DEA comparison method.7projects are the best DEA performance level, accounting for all involved in the evaluation of the projects6.09%.12projects’DEA performance are for second classification, accounted for all involved in the evaluation of project10.43%.17projects’DEA performance are for third classification, accounted for all involved in the evaluation of the project14.78%.13projects’ performance of DEA are for fourth classification, accounting for all the evaluation project11.30%.11projects performance of DEA are for fifth classification, accounted for all involved in the evaluation of the project9.57%.40projects performance level of DEA are for sixth classification, accounting for all involved in the evaluation project34.78%.(6) The analysis of project classification performance from different angles. From the distribution of regional perspective, the quantity of procts of Dongcheng’projects performance amount at each level of performance classification generally, the performance of Chaoyang’projects mainly distribute in third grade and fourth grade,the first,second and fifth project classification is less, the number of projects accounted for half of the total sixth performance of the project. In Haidian, without project whose performanceis in first classification, sixth level of performance projects accounted for about one quarter of the total number of the projects.Among Xicheng’s projects,without first performance classification project, the quantity of sixth performance classification projects and non-output projects is large amount, in four regional large quantity of funded project Districts, projects’ performance of Dongcheng is the best, followed by Haidian. About Chaoyang, because of the existence of a large number of performance level for the sixth projects, it’s performance is worstethan Haidian. Projects’performance of Xicheng is the worst district. From the nature of the hospitals, the suburb’s project performance were grade sixth or invalid; project performance level is for second grade, third grade and ineffective. army hospitals’s project performance is in grade two and grade six. The central hospitals’s project performance are distributed in each performance level, of which four projects amount about one quarter the number of project performance project, sixth levels of performance projects accounted for about one quarter, the project number of third level project performance is more in other performance level projects. Distribution in hospitals of the project at different levels of performance in the central hospitals is similar, quantity sixth performance project more, second level, third level, level fifth and invalid item number, a little more than a stage performance the number of projects, projects in fourth level performance are less. From the project period, the best performance projects are projected in2002,2005,2007. And performance of2005projects is the best year of all.The performance of projects funded in1998,1999drives poor.Conclusion From1998to2007, clinical medicine and joint research projects’average funding lines showed a gradual decreasing trend. From7kinds of indexes this paper quantified as the subject property out of view, these projects’relative performance differ, performance of part of the projects in all aspects of production is very high, a large part of the projects’output is not good,DEA performance shows the project number of best performance is very few, sixth levels of performance in all participating projects accounted for a larger proportion of. From the distribution of regional perspective, the projects’performance of suburb’s hospitals is poor, the other properties of third distributions’project performance are similar, prompt suburb’s hospitals as the lead hospitals clinical medicine and joint research project is still debatable. From the distribution of regional perspective, Haidian, Chaoyang, Dongcheng and Xicheng,where the most large number of projects are in, Dongcheng’s projects show the best performance in the four distributions, followed by Haidian, Chaoyang is a bit worse than Haidian, Xicheng’s projects show the worst performance,but the difference among four is little. From the project year, relative performance grade of projects projected in2005in all show relatively better way.