| The article selected “jitiâ€proses and “jishi†proses of Fang Bao which is themost valuable part in his proses as the research object, and with Fang Bao’s“jitiâ€proses and “jishi†proses as the breakthrough point of the research. The authorconcretely analyzed the characteristics of the two kinds of styles and try to analyze therelation and distinction between the two kinds of styles in detail in order toscientifically and scrupulously interpret views about these two styles from Tongchengdenomination. This research is not only favorable to thses literary styles, but alsoprofit the development of the more and more deepening FangBao and Tongchengdenomination.Introduction included the research object, the scope and the significance ofthesis and summarized the research status and research methods of thesis.Chapter one is the study of FangBao “jiti†proses. The first section, The themeand the constitution of the “jitiâ€proses and compositionï¼›The second section, theideas of the FangBao “jiti†prosesï¼› The third section, artistic characteristics of theFangBao “jiti†proses.Chapter two is the study of FangBao “jishi†proses. The first section, thetheme and the constitution of the “jishiâ€proses and compositionï¼›The second section,From the structure, purpose and perspectives analyzed narrative law of the Fang Bao“jishi†articleï¼›The third section, the artistic characteristics of the FangBao “jishiâ€proses.Chapter three discourse the relation and distinction both the FangBao“jitiâ€proses study and the FangBao“jishiâ€proses study. The first section, the relation anddistinction both th“ejitiâ€proses study and th“ejishiâ€proses studyï¼›The second section,the relation and distinction both the FangBao “jitiâ€proses and the FangBao“jishiâ€proses study.Conclusion is the status of literary history of Fang Bao’s “jiti†proses and“jishi†proses. |