The Rectification With Miracle’s Aufheben And Human Nature’s Regression

Hume pointed criticism of religious theology to the "miracles", the difference is, thiscriticism is built on top of his philosophy of empiricism, Hume found sufficient evidences forthe "miracles can not be" by empirical demonstration. The principle of empiricism makes thetraditional religious concept revolutionized the, from the perspective of religious studies hasalso been a radical change. Not treat religious mystical vision, but to deny this mysterioushuman uncertainty; mask to cover up the natural sciences rationality itself attempts to rebuild,but with the experience of the principles of a more robust human awareness building. Humebelieves that blindly seek confirmatory of religious belief in the power of knowledge can notsolve the problem, he desirability reliable basis to find the humanity in the field of experience.It is undeniable that the criticism of Hume on religious theology is based on the principleof empiricism, showing the unique qualities of the modern theory of knowledge. Cautiousskepticism against religious theology and all the radical atheism, he passed the "miracle" cannot demonstrate a strong critique of the fond dreams of tectonics of natural theology andreligious beliefs of mankind. Hume derive inspiration, trying to re-understand the meaning ofreligion, Hume for the multidimensional critique of the traditional religion of miracles, theonly credible basis for the return of the real world instead of miracles of the Christian, fromChristian Lai destroy the foundation of survival. Hume to the faces of the "anti-theologicaldefense of the secular world experience. The miracle of this anti-experience with untrusted ofempirical solutions. In Hume’s eyes, not credible things without the slightest significance forreal life, only to return to the real world to find a basis in the field of "moral" in order to trulyabandon the miracles and the return of the true human nature.