| Compared with the configuration language, such as English，the controlling of theChinese characteristics is weak, the word order and the different level of ingredients arenot static.There are many forms that do not conform to the language of the typicalconfiguration phenomenon. Especially in recent years, the structure of "vice+name", viaits particularity constantly triggers the scholars’discussion. So far, this kind of sentenceresearch or more mature, but in "still NP" sentence itself in research, and similar sentencethe contrast between the analysis, is still a bit of a feeble. Therefore, this paper tries to onthe former foundation, on the "still NP" format for further exploration.The structure of the sentence patterns that "still NP" performance characteristics for:sentence itself for shape of structure, the center word for nouns, but sentence thereappeared in the adverb "also", modal particle " Ne"."Also" generally can’t omit, in termsof form performance" vice+The name,"including" still "and" Ne "for often items, NPfor variable and present a predicate tendency. To this kind of structure, can not only fromthe semantic explanation, can not be completely through the grammar rules specification.Only from the semantic Angle to explain the difficult to get rid of the language senserestriction, increased foreign Chinese teaching and the difficulty of cross-culturalcommunication; Completely through the grammar rules is not start. Therefore, this articleintroduces the ideas of cognitive linguistics, in whole study period the "vice+name" theposition of the structure system, on the basis of the form from the syntactic, semanticfeatures, and from multiple perspectives, such as cognitive mechanism of "still NP"sentence deep mechanism is discussed in this paper.Because "still NP" sentence by two constants and a variable structure, so theconstants and variables respectively analysed, and then return the whole sentence, frompart to the whole, comprehensive discussion semantic and pragmatic restrictionmechanism. The analysis, this paper USES the method have: semantic backgroundanalysis, the minimum comparison method (common component analysis), and microanalysis method. In addition, this paper also used the expansion method, transform traditional analysis viewpoint, strive to study the language practice confirmed the methodto solve the problems in the new language. |
