| Conflict discourse is first developed from abroad and given more attention with thefurther study of discourse analysis. With the in-depth study of discourse analysis, foreignscholars have carried out numerous studies of conflict discourse in specific areas, andanalyzed the language characteristics in every specific field. For instance, classroomdiscourse, narrative discourse, court discourse and conflict discourse and so on have started tobecome the language scholar’s research objects. After that, the research perspective and theresearch range of conflict discourse are expanding constantly, and it reveals that the urgencyand the importance of the study of conflict discourse. The study on conflict discourse startedlate in China, although in recent years some scholars have studied the discourse conflict frommultiple perspectives, it may not be enough for the rich content areas of the conflict discourse.The conflict discourse studies involving multiple theories, choosing a theory to have anoverall analysis on discourse conflict is very necessary. Based on the above considerations,the author uses combination of the static description and dynamic analysis, has a qualitativeanalysis on corpora from the perspective of pragmatics, and summarizes the laws, reveals thestructure, types and causes of phylogenetic relationships conflict discourse, so as to seeksolutions, it has theoretical and practical significance on the research of conflict discourse.The research on the conflict discourse has enriched the content of discourse analysis, itprovides a guidance and a reference for certain discourse analysis. From the pragmatic pointof view, especially from the face theory, the author has an integrated research on phylogeneticrelationship conflict discourse, reaches the relationship between conflict discourse and face,while noting the western face theory has both consistency and difference for Chinese kinship,this study will provide a case for studying a certain field of conflict discourse. |
