The Corresponding Study Of Korean’(?)’ In Chinese

There are many studies of‘(?)’Funtil now, but each scholar kept their own ideas in the academia and can not reach an agreement. As to part of speech, some scholars thought‘(?)’is a verb, some scholars th ought that it is an adjective and others recognized it as a subsistent word. The usage of‘(?)’is very complex, so its usage is very difficult to the learners who take Chinese as his mother tongue. As to the learners who take Korean as his mother tongue, it is hard to have a good hold of its corresponding form in Chinese.This thesis is conscious that the usage of‘(?)’is hard to understand and decides to research into it. This paper takes precedent studies as bases, analyzes and discourses its Chinese corresponding form. The paper focus on the meaning and syntax of‘(?)’. Korean not only has original usage but also has assistant usage. This paper will focus on the usage when‘(?)’acts as a notional word.In the first chapter mainly introduced the study purpose, precedent st udies, study method and the select of material. Precedent studies included the study in Korea and China.In the second chapter it has discussed the meaning, syntax of‘(?)’ As notional word‘(?)’has15kinds of meanings. And we can divide it into dynamic meaning and state meaning.In the third chapter, it has discussed the corresponding words of‘(?)’ in Chinese and the corresponding form of conjunction.The last chapter is conclusion. It has generalized the first three c hapters’contents and pointed out the defects of this paper.This thesis discussed the corresponding form of‘(?)’in Chinese from meaning and sentence structure. We hope that it could a help to the Chinese learners who are studying Korean and the Korean learners who are studying Chinese.