Clinical Research For Sensory Rehabilitation Treatment On Cerebral Infarction

Objectives:1.To explore the effects of sensory rehabilitation treatment on motor function and sensory function in cerebral infraction patients.2.To examine the changes of ADL before and after treatment for sensory rehabilitation treatment on cerebral infarction patients in order to evaluate the clinical effect comprehensively.3.To investigate the relationship between sensory function and motor function.Methods:60cerebral infarction patients were randomly recruited into training and control groups. Normal rehabilitation treatment was received by the two groups for40minutes every session five days a week. In addition, the training group was received sensory rehabilitation treatment five days a week. The rehabilitation exercises which the patients check in would be done with the help of their folks. The optimized Fugl-meyer and lindmark assessment (FLA) and The simplified Fugl-meyer assessment (FMA) were evaluated and analyzed at the recruitment, the end of1st,2nd,3rd and6th month separately after infarction. The modified Bathel index (ADL) was evaluated and analyzed before and after the treatment.Results:1.No significant differences were found in FLA between the training and control groups. The FLA of the control group increased gradually at the recruitment, the end of1st,2n,3rd and6th, but the significant differences were found only at the end of3rd and6th comparing with previous assessments. The FLA cerements in training group were bigger than that in the control group at the end of2nd,3rd and6th. Significant differences of3rd and6th were found between neighboring evaluations in training group.2.The FMA of the control group increased gradually at the recruitment, the end of1st,2nd,3rd and6th. The FMA increments in training group were bigger than in the control group at the end of1st,2nd,3rd and6th. Significant differences of2nd,3rd and6th were found between neighboring evaluations in training group.3.The MBI after treatment was obviously higher than that of before treatment in training group and in control group. Compared with control group, The MBI of6th after treatment in training group was increased.4. The recovery of sensory increased gradually6.7%at the recruitment, the end of1st and2nd; increased19.1%in3rd; last three months keep increasing rapidly, increased24.16%at the end of3rd to6th; The recovery of motor increased gradually6%to20.77%and12.13%at the end of1st to2nd and3rd.Conclusions:1.Compared with normal rehabilitation treatment, sensory rehabilitation treatment could increase sensory function and motor function in cerebral infarction patients.2.Compared with normal rehabilitation treatment, sensory rehabilitation treatment could obviously improve ADL in cerebral infarction patients.3.Motor function recovery was faster than sensory function at the first3months; Sensory function recovery usually after2nd month.