| Purpose:Treatment with control group comparative study of the program, the objectiveevaluation of prescriptionof invigorating qi replenishing yinresolving dampness to interfereinthesyndrome of deficiency qi and yin with dampness in diabetes mellitus of the efficacy and safety.Methods:A randomized.controlled trial was conducted60patients with the syndrome of were randomly classified into two groups.On the basic of normal treatment and modern medicine,the patients of treated group (n=30) were treated by Chinese medicine while the patients of controlled group (n=30) were not.Three months was a course of treatment.The observed indexes included both curative effect indexes,such as clinical symptoms,FBG,PBG, HbAlc, blood fat, FINSand ISI,the function of liver and kidney and harmful reaction.The complete data carries on statistics analysis by the SPSS16.0statistics software.Results:Prior treatment,the gender,age,course of disease of the two groups patients had no differeces.①The total effective rate of treated roup patients was90.00%; while the controlled group was60%.The treated group had an advantage than the controlled group (P<0.01).②The postprandial blood glucose, HbAlc of two groups were lowered (P<0.01). And the treated group had an advantage than the controlled group (P<0.05).③Compared with pre-treatment. in the treated group patients’TC had a lowering (P<0.05),and TG,LDL—Chad a lowering and HDL-C,had marked increased (P＜0.01), showing that the combination of Western medicine and chinese medicine has the function of adjusting fat and it does much better than using western medicine effected only in TC and HDL-C.④Treatment group patients reduced fasting insulin, ISI has increased, and before treatment are significant difference compared (P<0.01); Before and after fasting insulin treatment group there were no significant difference (P>0.05), after treatment the ISI has increased the control group, and before treatment more difference (P <0.05). The treatment group, the improvement of the ISI fasting insulin than the control, group were significant difference (P<0.01).⑤safety index:kidney and liver function examination are in the normal range. Both groups has not seen the adverse reaction... |
