| In this experiment efects of cysteamine on growth performance of finishing pigs was studied and some hormone concentrations levels, blood biochemical parameters, carcass traits and meat quality were determined. 192 "Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire" pigs at the age of 110 days and about 60kg body weight were selected for this study. The pigs, were randomly divided into groupâ… , groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢and groupâ…£, and three replicates were designed in each group, each replicate was contained 16 pigs. Groupâ… was as control group, fed the basal diet. Groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were as experiment groups fed the basal diet added with 200mg·kg-1, 400mg·kg-1, 600mg·kg-1 of 30 percent cysteamine respectively.The results were as follows:1. Effect of cysmeatine on production performance and economic benefits of fattening pigs Average daily gain in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were increased to 3.20%, 9.10%, 7.06% compared to groupâ… . Among them, groupâ…¢and groupâ…£was great significantly higher than groupâ… (P<0.01), significantly higher than groupâ…¡(P<0.05) and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Feed conversion ratio in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were decreased by 1.61%, 4.52%, 3.23% compared to groupâ… . Among them, groupâ…¢was significantly higher than groupâ… and groupâ…¡(P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Economic benefits of groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£increased to 14.44 yuan, 43.15 yuan, 29.52 yuan compared to group.2. Effect of cysmeatine on the blood level of hormones of fattening pigs Growth hormone concentrations in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢and groupâ…£were increased to 1.54%, 7.38% and 5.54% compared to groupâ… . Groupâ…¢was significantly higher than groupâ… (P<0.05) and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Somatostatin concentrations in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were decreased by 3.33%, 11.67%, 6.67% compared to groupâ… . Groupâ…¢was significantly higher than groupâ… (P<0.05) and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). T3 concentrations in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢and groupâ…£were increased to 4.00%, 8.00%, 6.00% compared to groupâ… . Groupâ…¢was significantly higher than groupâ… (P<0.05) and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). T4 concentrations in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were increased to 3.45%, 4.94%, 4.47% compared to groupâ… . The differences were not significant among them (P>0.05).3. Effect of cysmeatine on blood biochemical index of fattening pigs Serum urea nitrogen in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were decreased by 8.57%, 12.75%, 5.27%, compared to groupâ… . Among them, groupâ…¢was significantly lower than groupâ… (P<0.01), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Total cholesterol in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were decreased by 3.88%, 13.79%, 10.34%. The differences were not significant among them (P>0.05). Alanine aminotransferase ratio in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢, groupâ…£were increased to 2.76%, 9.42%, 4.91%, compared to groupâ… . Groupâ…¢and groupâ…£were significantly higher than groupâ… (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05).4. Effect of cysmeatine on carcass traits and meat quality of fattening hogs Lean meat rate of groupâ…¢was significantly higher than groupâ… (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Bone ratio in groupâ…¢was significantly higher than that in groupâ… (P<0.01), and significantly higher than groupâ…¡(P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed between groupâ…¢and groupâ…£(P>0.05). Fat ratio in groupâ…¡, groupâ…¢and groupâ…£were decreased by 14.08%, 13.79%, 8.86%, compared to groupâ… . Groupâ…¢was significantly lower than groupâ… , groupâ…¡and groupâ…£(P<0.01), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Fat thickness of 6th rib and 7th rib in groupâ…¢and groupâ…£was decreased by 11.79%, 7.41%, respecively compared to groupâ… and was significantly lower than groupâ… (P<0.01). No significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Eye muscle area between the groups was not significant (P>0.05). Hind legs ratio in groupâ…¢was significantly higher than that in groupâ… (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05).Muscle pH and muscle color were no significant difference (P>0.05) among the groups. Intramuscular fat percentage in groupâ…¢and groupâ…£was significantly lower than groupâ… and groupâ…¡(P<0.01), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05). Muscle water content in groupâ…¢was significantly higher than groupâ… (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed between other groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: In finishing pigs diets supplemented with 400mg·kg-1 of 30 percent of cysteamine can promote the growth of fattening pig, reduce fat deposition, improving carcass quality, save the cost of feeding. |