The content of avermectin B1a in extractor was determined by HPLC. Active components showed good linear relationship in the range of 24-240mg·L-1 (r=0.9999). The methods can be used for the quality control.By using the content of avermectin B1a as quality control criteria, The effects of medium, ratio material to liquid, power, time frequency and extraction time on the extractive results of avermectin B1a were explored at the same time. The optimum ultrasonic extraction conditions were as follows: 95% ethanol, 1: 5 (w/v) ,the Ratio material to liquid; 400W, the supersonic power; 20 min, the supersonic time. Repetition operation and the yield of avermectin B1a was 95.22%. The extractor of ultrasonic extraction in circulation was only 20min and the yield of avermectin B1a was 96.22%.By using the content of avermectin B1a as quality control criteria, The effects of pressure, temperature, extraction time, the flow rate of CO2, and separate temperature on the extractive results of avermectin B1a were explored at the same time, the curves of the influence factors were drawn. The SFE- CO2 conditions for avermectin B1a were as followed: pressure 30MPa, temperature 45℃, the CO2 volumetric rate 6.4L/h, extraction time 1.5h, the sepatate pressure 5 MPa, the separate temperature 40℃. The result showed that the avermectin B1a extractive yield was 97.21%.Compared with the technology of SFE-CO2, ultrasonic extraction and the solubilities in ethanol. The result showed that the SFE-CO2 of avermectin B1a was simple and efficient. The produce cost of SFE was lower and the crystallization craft was simple, the crystall purity was 92.21%. The ultrasonic extraction time was shorter, but the crystallization craft was complex. The solubilities in ethanol of extraction time was longer and the crystallization craft was complex. |