The Conflict Of Privacy And Freedom Of The Press And Equitable

Nowadays, along with the aggravation of the medium competition, the actions of infringing people's privacy are frequent. For attracting the eyeballs of the mass, the way and the content of report frequently involves people's privacy. How to protect the right to privacy is a hot topic which becomes more and more important, and how to define the object of the privacy is more and more necessary.In the democracy modern world, the citizens' privacy and the freedom of news are closely related. For one thing, the citizens' privacy needs the protection of law. For another thing, it should be strengthened about the social function of the media. If overemphasizing the responsibility of the media, it would bring about so much trouble to the medium. The citizens' privacy and the freedom of the press are both the basic rights of citizens, when the conflicts between them occur, which is more important? Especially with the development on fully speed of modern information technology, The way of public communication is more and more advanced so that the conflicts between them are more obvious. How to harmonize the conflicts and how to protect the freedom of news with the workable of news transmission as well as the peace in citizens' inner hearts and give them the pure surroundings? All these things are the hot focus needing to be solved.The text aims to a reasonable definition, the relative balance of the freedom of the press and right to privacy through the analysis on the liu jia appeal to Jiangsu Educational Tv station case. The text is composed of preface,text and conclusion. And the text is divided into five parts.The first part, case.The second part, the introduction of the case.The third part, the controversial focus. That is, how to define the object of the privacy? How to define the result of spirit damage as one element of the press infringe upon right to privacy? How to handle it when the conflict happens between the freedom of the press and the right to privacy?The fourth part, the controversy between the relative doctrine.The fifth part, the key point of the text. The author brings forward own opinion combining the case in the text and the relative doctrines. The author agrees with the opinion of Zhang Xinbao Pro. about the definition of privacy, the action doctrine of spirit damage, and solving the conflict between the freedom of the press and the right to privacy through case interest evaluation. Finally some advice is given to the legislation.