| Along with the accelerated process of building a socialist country ruled by law and human rights, democracy and other values people, how to build a just and reasonable, while proceedings for crime control model of great significance. Investigation procedures as an integral part of the proceedings, in reality is often a double-edged sword play the role it is to expose crime, the crime that critical stage, is also limited to a maximum of criminal suspects and sometimes serious violations of fundamental human rights suspects stage.I believe that investigation work has become common knowledge, primarily coercive measures unreasonable. Mandatory measures of too little, and mainly confined to the suspects, rather than limiting their freedom of movement, lack of application of coercive measures of judicial review and the lack of flexibility. This is not only a huge waste of judicial resources, and is not conducive to discrimination. I try to study my existing enforcement measures deficiencies, and system integration and useful for our modern system of litigation brainstorming, the theory and practice of positive interactions.In the course of writing this article, and from a large number of reference on the criminal, investigation of the monographs and papers, and judicial and from the front line peer seriously explored. Undoubtedly, the formation of their wisdom to this is also very important.Introduction of the text is divided into five parts, about 40,000 words.The first part is a theoretical concept of coercive measures Tanxi. Briefed on the concept of relevant domestic enforcement measures, and a comparative study of the concept. In a comparative study on the basis of our judicial practice, from legal enforcement measures discussed the meaning and intention. Focus on the analysis of the distinction between... |
