With comparison and analysis about some issues of the crime of huge unidentified property, this dissertation puts forward the suggestion of legislation improvement. After a comparative analysis I think the purpose of setting this crime is to punish criminals, which is also the purpose of legislation. As far as the name is concerned, I suggest name it "unlawfully possessing huge unidentified property". As far as the subject of crime is concerned, I think it infringes the clearness of the government officials, "possessing" is the objective feature of this crime and " deliberately " indicates the subjective feature of this crime namely unlawfully possessing huge unidentified property deliberately. Since the objectives of this crime are government officials, I suggest enlarge the objectives to the retired government officials, the relatives of the public servants. In the convention of law application, first, it identifies the income of the officials and their relatives. Second it identifies the differences among fraud, bribery, corruption. At last it emphasize that the accused take no responsibility of proof but the judiciary take the responsibility to prove the guilty of the criminals. |