Contract To Defraud Study

This paper discusses contract swindle from four aspects. First, the origin and development of the charge of contract swindle are investigated. It points out that contract swindle becomes single charge when it is separated from traditional swindle. This suits the objective needs of judicial practice. Second, on the basis of concluding crime component parts of contract swindle, the paper thinks that in judicial practice, we should center on the features of this swindle such as the variety of objective behavior expression, limitations of "contract" range, definition of subjective deliberation and pluralism of crime party and so on. Third, expert evidence of contract swindle. First of all, the author focuses his discussion on the distinction between contracts swindle and contract dispute. He also distinguishes between the two parts from evidence angle. Then distinguishes between contract swindle and similar crime, that is, contract swindle and financial fraud. And last, the punishment application of contract swindles. The author focuses his discussion on grasping swindle seriousness.