| Accident that we do not want to happen and to see, looting our property when an accident happened is even more intolerable. However in recent years, the frequent occurrence of such events: January 23, 2006, Shanxi Province, villagers looting citrus events; October 27, 2008, Hangzhou hundred villagers fish looting incident; July 2010 on the 12 th, high-speed diesel Lanzhou section of Diesel fuel crowd looting incident;July 13, 2011 in Nanchang, Jiangxi villagers looting melon events and so on. January4, 2014 incident in Lanzhou looting orange heat has not dissipated, Henan province have a truck rollover on the 10 th, more than 20 tons of apples were people looting. For these events might like user friends said, the difference is not looting posture, but you have anything worth looting.Goods or money scattered on the ground when an accident occurred. Why such people looting rather than picking up the belongings back to the victim of the situation?Why would people looting "everlasting" ? What is the power of curbing the people looting? These issues worth considering. For this situation, the paper set example of the Case of Lanzhou, to looking for the moral issues that reflected and legal rules than committed, from the psychology of plunders.This article will be divided into four parts to explore:Part I: The basic circumstances of the case, including the source and the merits of the case description, differences of opinion and the focus of debate;Part II: Analysis of legal issues, namely, by reading books, access to information and other ways to analysis and research the debate focus on the first part of the-related legal issues;Part III: Analysis and conclusions of the case, that is, by the law of the second part of the analysis, to find out the legal norms for the case should be applied;Part IV: Revelation of the case study, that is, through the first three analysis and research, I have a revelation and the views, the ideas and so on.The frequent looting events is not simply to illustrate the problem by moral decline and decay, facing the crowd looting can not simply as a means of moral condemnation.The act of people looting is the psychological that humans can not resist,therefore, purely by moral prescriptions to stop the looting acts are not functioning. To stop looting evens, need the law as the criterion,strengthen and strict law enforcementlooters violated norms on which to standardize punishment,which is based on the mental errors that " law is not responsible for the masses" to get rid of punishment. If the looters in violation of the "Penalty Law Public Security Administration," should be punished according to the law; if the looters have been arrested for criminal acts should be in accordance with the "Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China" for punishment. Punish looting acts, improve compliance costs, strengthen external control of laws and regulations, so that the law reaches to those corner that had not yet covered,that’s the meaning of social governance. |
PDF Full Text Request