Anti-monopoly Law And Industrial Policy

Promulgated in August 2007, "The People's Republic of China anti-monopoly law," whether in the application of the law, or in relations with other economic policies, many problems exist. How to solve the application of antitrust laws, and straighten out the relationship with other economic policies is the current issue of particular concern to scholars. China's "anti-monopoly law," ArticleⅣon the one hand confirmed the determination of the national competition policy, on the other hand the state to develop other economic policies, particularly industrial policy has left enough space for the implementation of industrial policy, however, as they reflect on the support or inhibit specific industries, which compete with the free market order, conflict, and therefore the competition represented by anti-monopoly law and industrial policy is the relationship between the brunt to rationalize.This study idea is from China's "anti-monopoly law," the fourth talk in order to judge the value of fairness and efficiency as the core, in order to recognize the "anti-monopoly law" and the dialectical interdependence between industrial policy, the logical premise, using comparative analysis method, economic analysis and other methods, from the rule of law and economic structure optimization of two perspectives of "anti-monopoly law" and the industrial policy relations.In the language of the structure, the article in the "Introduction" section, first of all by means of the famous French sociologist, E·Durkheim in his book "sociological approaches to the guidelines" on "pathological and normal," the distinction between theory, competition policy, regardless of or the implementation of industrial policy, in fact, are a healthy market economy, the "normal", but under normal market economy conditions how can the existence of two conflicting "normal" mean? The author believes that "industrial policy, just as the national initiative to vaccines, although to some extent undermined the market competition mechanism, but to avoid further intensification of the contradictions of the market." Logic, which first launched the two can coexist, and be able to coordinate.The article first and second part of the antitrust laws do not set out the principles and industrial policy in the system and horizontal combing on the basis of comparison on China's anti-monopoly law and industrial policy, present and future is reviewed and prospects, resulting in macro-and micro-Both are on a more comprehensive grasp; articleⅢ,Ⅳare core parts of this paper, respectively, from both perspectives of optimizing the economic structure to explain the relationship between antitrust and industrial policy, an attempt from the jurisprudence with the principles of economics, both to complete a comprehensive observation of this proposition. Draw the following conclusions:anti-trust laws and industrial policy to achieve integration and coordination; articles from the equity and efficiency in the final dialectical relationship between the start of the anti-monopoly law and industrial relations policy, integration, and research namely, the origin of China's "anti-monopoly law," the application of Article IV to make meaningful insights.