| North Korea nuclear issue has always been a sensitive problem in international affairs since the 1990th; it is an intertexture of history and reality. What it involves is not only the problem of interest between North Korea and America, it also reflects the gaming of the powers, and its ups and downs have been a potential safety hazard of the Northwest Asia and the pan-Pacific area.China had been seeking for the mediation positively and finally takes the Six-Party Talks as a dispute settlement body which has been held for seven times since 2003. The Six-Party Talks has opened a gap for each side to reduce the differences progressively and enlarge the consensus with a constructive posture to make a way for the settlement of the differences through dialogue. With the advance of the discussion of the substantial problems, it's difficult to avoid the twist and turns, but the Six-Party Talks will probably be the best method to solve the Korea nuclear issue.From the prospect of the international law, to settle international disputes peacefully should take an appropriate mode, follow the standard of the law, use lofty negotiation skills and keep the good tendency of negotiation. The Six-Party Talks try to mediate between America and North Korea, promote the multilateral talk and solve the North Korea nuclear issue peacefully in the direction of philosophy of consensus. Its juristic and political effects are both the key of the solution of international disputes and a subject which need a constant discussion. This paper tries to analyze the validity of the activities of America and North Korea and the related agreement in the Six-Party Talks, hoping that it can help with a deeper understanding of the North Korea nuclear issue. |