"deprivation" And "transformation"

The thesis consists of six parts:Chapter one The reasons issued by "Tong-Gou-Tong-Xiao"(state monopoly for purchase and marketing)divided into three points, (first) the theory / legal basis; (second) the immediate cause: Grain crisis in 1953; (third) the deep contradictions between capitalism and socialism as well as national interests and peasants' interests .Chapter two There was a course from policy to the system in "Tong-Gou-Tong-Xiao". The system of "Tong-Gou" included: the means,power,strategy and lever. The system of "Tong-Xiao"(" system of the coupons ") influenced the system of "Tong-Gou" deeply. In a sense, both success and failure of "Tong-Gou" were decided by "Tong-Xiao" . There were contradictions not only between "Tong-Gou" and "Tong-Xiao", but also among every key element of "Tong-Gou".Chapter three depriving peasants throng " price scissors " was connected to Russian experience, but there were differences, too. The deprivation of "Tong-Gou-Tong-Xiao" included two parts: some were connected with the system itself, the others were connected with the operation of it. In the face of "deprivation", some anti-actions that made people review appeared in peasants.Chapter four Organizationally, "Tong-Gou-Tong-Xiao" accelerated the process of the rural collectivization; Economically, it influenced and transformed the production, exchange and distribution structure in the countryside deeply.Chapter five Relations between the system of "Tong-Gou-Tong-Xiao" and the countryside could be divided into four stages: Country shared in revolutionary achievement with peasant; country deprived peasant; the system tend to disintegrate ;the reprint of "Tong-Gou" .Several reviews Through "Tong-Gou-Tong-Xiao", agriculture and peasant had made historical contribution for national industrialization, had also paid the historical cost. To reconsider the cost, we should bear two issues in mind : one is to realize the economic purpose by political means; the other is to push modernization by way of anti-modernization.