Chinese Commercial Banks In The Greater Mekong Sub-regional Economic Cooperation Under The Framework Of "going Out" Study

With the integration of East Asian economic and deepening of trade liberalization, the fully completed China - ASEAN Free Trade Area, China-ASEAN trade and investment has increased year by year, which necessarily requires both sides to strengthen regional financial cooperation. As we all know, the GMS is not only a important part of the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area, but also the first experimental demonstration zones of it, so the success of GMS is of great importance to China - ASEAN Free Trade Area. Based on this background, China's commercial banks under the GMS framework is particularly significant to go out. It is just due to such "geo-economic - the geopolitical" feture in the GMS region, since the Asian Development Bank initiated the Greater Mekong sub-regional cooperation, both the West and ASEAN countries have been involved actively in it, having attached great importance to cooperation in this region. Therefore, the Chinese commercial banks in the GMS framework should "go out" , competing with the established international banks in the Greater Mekong Sub-region markets to seize new profit growth point.This article start from the theory of the Internazation of China's Commercial Bank , making a simple review and reorganization on the causes, effects and paths of Chinese commercial banks to go out. Then the study reach deep into the GMS framework, focusing on the necessity, feasibility, status and conditions of China's commercial banks to go out under the GMS framework, and eventually worked out the routing of China's commercial banks for going out and made specific suggestions .At present, the GMS is implementing open-led development strategy of commercial banks in the Greater Mekong sub-region for the "going out". Under the framework, we have such advantages: powerful econonmy ,increasing investment from non-financial enterprises and enhanced operating strength of Chinese commercial banks. At the same time , there is also barriers set by the host system and regulatory regime, and other political factors. To set out for the realization of China's commercial banks in the GMS framework better "going out" objectives, banks and focused on the following four aspects: international organizations, international business and management internation, talent internationalization. While in the government system we promoted the improvement of macro-environment for "going out", such as speeding up the financial system, building international strategy platform, achieving international regulatory and improving the governance environment.The paper used a Cournot equilibrium game theory to explain the choice of international institutions of China's commercial banks. By discussing the case of Thailand and comparing benefits and optimal strategy in both sides under different conditions , we eventually come to the conclusion that the the host country in the GMS framework prefer to accept the M & A investment banking model rather than the new investment models. While the situation in China is just the opposite, thus the game equilibrium between Chinese commercial banks and GMS5 commercial banks has been formed.