Form:form-techniques-function

When we face the word "form", the first problem encountered is vagueness of the definition. Specific to the Russian Formalism, as the school internal divergence of views among members of Opoyaz transfer their academic interest, in particular, the constant term changes, also obstacles in front of us. Seizing the original purpose of Opoyaz's study, downing their ideas, we can found the "form" in Russian Formalism, as the domain change history. It's "Form", from the "form" to "techniques" to "function" the way it evolved. First, we need to defend Russian Formalism, while who re-form but do not exclude the meaning. "nonsense poetry" is a good example. They didn't completely reject the content, but see "form" as the contents of the study, and see the "contents" which enter the work as a structure/form factor. So, in view of their research, everything became a form. All these built on a basis that is a dynamic language structure. The most fundamental form of literature is characterized by dynamic. Under the auspices of aesthetic function, literature is a dynamic entity. There's no static factors in its structure. Therefore, Opoyaz told us, literature, old and new forms of development is playing a extremely complex and never-ending game. When we are facing literature, we must be always ready to accept changes.