On Postmodern Management "Won" And "Lost"

In the 1980s, particularly since the 1990's, there are two main factors changing the social change business practices, the first high-speed communications technology for the development of production and business activities of enterprises of innovation provides infinite possibilities; First, enterprise management changes , a property rights model for the centre, promote the subject of the people, organizational and operational management pattern of subversion and change the organizational culture. The two common major changes in the role, and fundamentally changed the company's behavior, and it has also undermined the traditional patterns of behaviour management and key assumptions. However, in the study of modern management theory, rational scholars have tended to focus on technical factors and the impact of the enterprise management, especially for the classical theory of memory management and the development of research in the history of attribution, without exception, will be rational factors and technology as the most important factors, and will also play an important role in the Irration overlooked. In fact, enterprise management changes generated by new forms of business organization, the new property rights model, the new corporate culture, new human assumptions, it is a source of vitality of enterprise, the management of post-modernism to a direct impact on the management of the business act. Contemporary corporate business model, property rights model and corporate culture as well as the role of knowledge workers has been a significant post-modernity. After the diversification of the main modern management, stressed that the main autonomy and freedom and equality, inclusive organization employees "marginal groups" and their culture, managers and the managers focus on the significance of dialogue. Property management mode and the change makes the fate of the general staff linked together, the line between them is no longer in property and the right to manage gastric basis, but a knowledge-the right to speak, and business model innovation, the organization more flexible and can be effective response increasingly severe environmental changes.At the same time, post-modern management as a post-modern ideas of organizational behavior patterns, also has its own subversive role. After breaking the modern management from the culture of modern, postmodern culture in the overall organization, and culture of consumption on economic activities, the concept of organisms and adaptability, and the internal, personalized consumption, and the uncertainty of complex environmental, cultural pluralism,to break the marginalization of the Centre, the organizational structure of the network, as well as feminist culture, and other aspects of the direct impact on the management of change and made more flexible management of the contemporary features.But for the post-modern management does not blindly reject modern management, but criticism of the abandoned, assimilate and adopt the reasonable part of the non-rational excessive respected, also committed in the history of the rational development of committing the same mistakes, that is too one-sided and abstract, and even overkill, go to the extreme, this tendency makes some people vulnerable to extreme non-rational attitude towards life, even radical, superstition, in the non-rational incentives and power. On the grand narrative of the negative, easy to deviate from their people based on the pursuit of efficiency, it would also lead to the macro-management workers abandoned the analysis of the structural, management workers can not result from a macro perspective clients in the political, economic , and cultural environment, it will be impossible to achieve in-depth understanding of clients, thus seriously affecting the quality of service. Postmodern Management denied the existence of universal standards, it's all relative diversity, these arguments are likely to lose business management practice standards and the basic direction to face greater uncertainty and ambiguity, to change more conservative. In addition, the post-modern management respect for different individual personality and the choice of values, inclusive marginalized groups, rejected the mainstream value, which tends to have totally different subjective experience and perspective of the value of different individuals, it is difficult to form a fact recognized by the agreement. Precluded from the absence of a strong cohesion and common vision. Post-modern management theory is that the more abstract levels of thinking, the practical operation of specific consider less. Post-modern management with a clear view of the many idealistic color, and the further away from the scene Affairs difficult in practice and practical application. Postmodern Management negate the management elite hegemony, the hegemony of this denial easy to form new hegemony. In addition, over the mainstream norms to encourage individual and confrontation, would surely affect the stability of the existing order management, which resulted in the management of the potential confusion deliberately suppressing its development.This paper from the characteristics of post-modern management, the management of a post-modern, post-modern management, as well as a lack of modern management after the four-part enlightenment. After the adoption of modern management in the back and with the loss of that post-modern management in the post-modern thought is under a new management thinking to the management of the new breakthrough at the same time, managers should be sober Recognizing that any theory the emergence of their existence and the basis of its pros and cons of this modern management after a management and guide and analysis of management practices at the same time, it should be recognized that theoretical and practical There is a difference in nature. Facing a new management thinking, we should be glad that it is to our management has brought new blood and ideas, we should not be blindly optimistic about the overall acceptance, discard the past followed the traditional management of the reasonableness of the ingredients. But to address post-modern fate of China's specific national conditions, in the post-modern management theory expounded on the basis of the modern management after which the reasonableness of the traditional management components and the reasonableness of the components combine to provide practical guidance.The article in the post-modern and post-modern management to conduct a comprehensive and objective analysis on the basis of modern management after the gains and losses were also discussed. The post-modern management and development of retrospective assessment of the origin of their development, the errors have carried out a profound analysis. And modern management to the comparative analysis of post-modern organizations bring a change of the current scholars of research results, on the whole, a comprehensive summary and analysis. How to put a correct view of post-modern management, to avoid post-modern management and modern management of the bipolar confrontation with the view that the position of fault management ideas, dialectical made a number of observations. Contrast this to standardize research methods as the main method of research, focus on logical inference, but also using the construction of theoretical models and diagrams of research methods, verification and interpretation of the findings. However, due to the current domestic and foreign direct study of the modern organization of the cost management literature is extremely rare, so articles are summarized, summing up other areas of research results, thus forming the conclusion of the study and this framework, it is inevitable Guayilouwan, making conclusions may be questioned in the presence . In the absence of empirical data, difficult to use empirical research methods, formed by the conclusion of the necessary tests.