| An assumption made in many magnetic interpretation techniques is that ΔTact(total field anomaly — the measurement given by total field magnetometers, after we remove the main geomagnetic field, T0) can be approximated mathematically by ΔTpro(the projection of anomalous field vector in the direction of the earth’s normal field). In order to meet the demand for high-precision processing of magnetic prospecting, the approximate error E between ΔTact and ΔTpro is studied in this research. Generally speaking, the error E is extremely small when anomalies not greater than about 0.2T0. However, the error E may be large in highly magnetic environments. This leads to significant effects on subsequent quantitative inference. Therefore, we investigate the error E through numerical experiments of high-susceptibility bodies.A systematic error analysis was made by using a 2-D elliptic cylinder model. Error analysis show that the magnitude of ΔTact is usually larger than that of ΔTpro. This imply that a theoretical anomaly computed without accounting for the error E overestimate the anomaly associated with the body. It is demonstrated through numerical experiments that the error E is obvious and should not be ignored. It is also shown that the curves of ΔTpro and the error E had a certain symmetry when the directions of magnetization and geomagnetic field changed. To be more specific, the Emax(the maximum of the error E) appeared above the center of the magnetic body when the magnetic parameters are determined. Some other characteristics about the error E are discovered. For instance, the curve of Emax with respect to the latitude was symmetrical on both sides of magnetic equator, and the extremum of the Emax can always be found in the mid-latitudes, and so on. It is also demonstrated that the error E has great influence on magnetic processing transformation and inversion results.In addition, the influence of calculation error of total field anomaly to magnetic processing and conversion(e.g.,transformation of potential field, reduction to the pole, derivative transformation) is also studied in this paper. Finally, the effect of the calculation error E to the inversion results is also analyzed.It is concluded that when the bodies have highly magnetic susceptibilities, the error E can be great and affect the subsequent magnetic processing and inversion. Therefore, the error cannot be ignored when processing, inverting, and interpreting magnetic data in highly magnetic environments. |