A Comparison Between Marx 's And Stirner' S View Of Interest And Its Contemporary Value

Since the ancient times interests is one of the important topics of westernclassical philosophy, on the basis of predecessors’ thought Marx and Stirner formedtheir own interests ideals in succession, and each has a different effect.According to methods of comparative study between Marx and Stirner’s interestsideals, it can reproduce clearly the different formation processes and main points, andfind differences, it can also deepen the relationship of cognitive between inheritanceand transcendence. The formation of Marx’s concept has experienced four periods,each period the contents is different; Stirner’s ideals contained in his discourse of "theone". Marx’s and Stirner’s interests ideals is different,that not only embodies in thedifferent understanding of "needs", also in how to deal with private property, how tograsp the personal interests and the common interests of different relations as well ason issues such as how to understand the interests of the community. Marx not onlysystematically criticizes the Stirner’s ideals, and beyond Stirner’s interests ideals onthe basis of the criticism, namely the interests of reality person above the abstractperson, the protection of people’s property interests above the private person, thecomprehensive transcendence above one-sided selfish, the real community above thefalse league.At present, the influence of various interests ideals remain, comprehensivelydeepening reforms in the process of how to deal with increasingly complex interestrelations are both urgent and important. Comparing the two interests ideals on the onehand is to shape the scientific ideals and give full play to the guidance of Marx’sconcept, on the other hand is to coordinate the interest relationship provide thecertain theory reference and guidance.The main body of this article is mainly divided into three parts:The first part, this paper discusses the formation of Marx’s and logical operationof Stirner’s ideals. First of all, about the formation of Marx’s concept, it introduces itshistory and origin theory from the historical evolvement of the concept of western classical philosophy; Secondly, from the different stages of historical development,this paper introduces the main content of Marx’s ideals in stages; Again, in view of the"genius" outline of the significance of Marx’s interest theory, it introduces thecontaining interests of the theory. About the logic shipment of Stirner’s view ofinterest, first analyzes the meaning and necessity of Stirner’s extreme individualist;Secondly, analyzes the realization ways of Stirner’s plans. Through the introduction ofthe concept of Marx and Stirner, it paves the way for the comparison of two interestsideals.The second part, the comparison of Max’s and Stirner’s ideals, this is the mainpart of this article. It contains three major aspects: the first part is a detailedcomparison of Marx’s and Stirner’s ideals; the second part is to discuss thetranscendence from Marx to Stirner’s ideals; the third part is to analyze the theoryorigin of Marx’s and Stirner’s different ideals. On the first part, because there is nospecific works on Marx’s and Stirner’s ideals, so the values of both are not rigorouslogic system, which only extracts from several aspects to compare, such as how toexplain the interest premise of need, how to deal with private property, therelationship between personal interests and common interests, how to understand theinterests of the community and so on. Marx’s concept beyond Stirner’s is the focus ofthis section, and this paper discusses the four aspects of transcendence: the interests ofreality person above the abstract person, the protection of people’s property interestsabove the private person, the comprehensive transcendence above one-sided selfish,the real community above the false league. Finally, the paper analyzes the differenttheory origins of Marx’s and Stirner’s ideals. Due to the philosophical basis, as thedifferent logical starting point and theoretical roots, they two forms the differentvalues.The third part is the comparison of contemporary value of Marx’s and Stirner’sideals. At first comparing Marx’s and Stirner’s ideals, but once mentioned thecomparison, finally it should work out its contemporary value and need to discuss themeaning of comparison. For the purpose of theory research to return to practice and topractice guiding role, so in view of our country present situation of the interest relations, it analyzes the comparison of the contemporary value: In theory it helps tounderstand and know the scientific values, The practical significance is: the first isconducive to the reasonable interests of individual; the second is to handle therelationship between personal and social community; the third is conducive to socialrelations on the basis of rationalization in realizing the interests of the socialequilibrium, the fourth is providing theoretical support for increasing propertyincome.