A Study On The Auxiliary Personnel System Of Criminal Procedure In China

Characteristics of justice, including the meaning of freedom, fairness and justice,is now mainly reflected in the relevant scientific widely among judicial proof. Inindividual cases, there is a problem, and more need to emphasize the use of scienceand technology, along with the corresponding forensic system came into being, butalso in the three procedural play an increasingly important role. At the same time, weshould also be noted that in practice there has been a series of problems, in particularin the course of litigation activity in sharp contradiction contradictory, leading tocontroversy after another view of this, it is imperative that the reform has necessary.This paper discusses a number of issues to build Criminal Procedure ExpertAssistant system, focusing on aspects of assisted human expert elective qualification,litigation status, rights and obligations, to participate in proceedings in criminalproceedings, such as the specific set of experts who assist system is discussed.2012revised "Code of Criminal Procedure" in the experts who assisted generalizations, justgive us a basic idea of constructing a complete system rather than a more vagueidentification of people like specious. In summary, our criminal litigation specialistswho assisted to construct the system, not only is the correct understanding, assessmentand use of expert opinion is needed, but also the fundamental requirements oflitigation activities "settling disputes" in nature. Only clear Expert Assistantqualifications, reasonable definition of the experts who assisted the status of areasonable standard of experts assisted the opinions effectiveness, and improverelevant experts who assisted procedural rules, in order to fully protect the criminalprosecution experts who assisted the function and role of play,breakthrough in thegeneral provisions of the Act, to better serve the practice.