| With the development of national trade, for the sake of balancing the interests ofWTO members, prevent members of WTO violation in trade negotiations agreedcommitments, non violation complaints as an important procedural remedies in WTOdispute settlement mechanism of emerge as the times require. With the increase ofnon litigation liability of the illegal, its defect is more and more obviouss.On theaspect of rules, the expert group for "reasonable expectation interest" has not formed aunified explanation, the ruling "in the non violation complaints in a non illegalmeasures have caused the nullification or impairment" has different standards ofjudgment..In jurisdiction, as long as the complainant believes that its interests for nonviolation complaints, the jurisdiction of the non litigation cases of violation continuesto expand to cause the risk of abuse. In actual operation, the causal relationshipbetween the burden of proof is more complicated and difficult, which increases thenon violation operation difficulty.With the continuous development of internationaltrade market, China is facing the Western powers to America represented by trying tonon violation complaints to resolve the dispute on RMB exchange rateissue,complaint subject,the WTO non violation complaint behavior of the content andthe burden of proof angle, to solve China’s RMB exchange rate in the non violationcomplaints is not legitimate. |