A Study On Tibetan Buddhism

In between the growing Indian movement toward Prasangika and Tibet doxographic hicrarchy,twelfth-century Tibet saw a growing diversity of Prasangika and Svatantrika interpretations of the Middle Way.But the prasangika form of Tibetan Buddhism philosophy became more important part of Tibetan Buddhism. Especially since the beginning of the Gelugpa,the vast majority lamas studies the prasangika form. The prasangika form of Tibetan Buddhism philosophy become the main method and type theory as Tibetan Buddhist debate activity,and become one of Tibetan Buddhism’s oldest Buddhist activities, but also to become a Tibetan Buddhism is different from other regions, has been highly respected by world Tibetology lovers.Science the prasangika form of Tibetan Buddhism philosophy not only a method of debate, more importantly, it is itself a reflection of the habit of thinking of the Tibetan,the theory is widely used in many fields of social life in Tibet. While it itself is profound, not only for thousands of years, and related commentaries research is extremely vast, in the entire history of Tibetan Buddhism, has a significant impact.The prasangika form of Tibetan Buddhism philosophy have a long history, but also through a process of continuous development and improvement, many senior lama paid a lifetime of effort to make it farmous, especially the development of Gelugpa period, so that makes the amount of Tibetan Buddhism lamma and laymen learn the prasangika form.The prasangika form as a method in the field of Tibetan Buddhism, as same as plays an important role. From the perspective of the debate, not only exists in the Tibetan Buddhist debate,but also being in judicial practice, especially in a court trial, the debate between the defendant and the plaintiff, judicial practice is also important indispensable element for the maintenance of justice and justice has important significance.Thus,Buddhism and judicial debate on the methodology can learn from each other. Thus abstract of Buddhist is supplemented indirection and flexibility with judicial debate, as well as make up for debate by the Buddhist very meaningful.