In the painting, the theme, images, themes and situations to build the artist’s main content.And how to build a complete picture of the formation of a unified style, many scholars havebeen studying exploration, but also we need to solve. In this paper, the subconscious Freudianpsychoanalysis and dream interpretation theory surrealist master Salvador Dali’s works to buildsituational images, analyzed and compared the system. To interpret both the relevance anddifference. First discusses the theoretical basis of the rise and the surrealist movement. Followedby the theme of diversity in Dali’s works: aspects of the war, sex, love, religion, etc., toexplore the works of construction of the rational factors and expression. A case study of theworks to build a concrete source elements that appear in his paintings. Again, Freud’sInterpretation of Dreams by the theory of drawers Dalà recurring, soft table, crutches, ants, andother symbolic shadow images were analyzed and compared, to explore the nature of the sourceof these images is the desire Daly transcription and expression and the theme of rational analysisor learn a little deformed, rather than " subconscious dream " is not the kind of mind controlfaithful record.Next, we analyzed the Freudian psychoanalysis subconscious theory, discusses the id, egoand superego between the complex and the interaction of the complex relationship of mutualcontainment. Then through the understanding of Freud ’s dream desire modification summary ofthree works, to understand the operating mechanism of the dream, reverse comparative analysisof Dali’s " dream" to build a non-sexual dream. As Freud evaluation of Dali, seen in hispaintings is conscious rather than unconscious, Dali’s " Dream " is a mode of thinking to mimicmental patient is under conscious state concocted out of the unconscious painting, we firstdefined the concept of the unconscious, is not to be aware of the unconscious conscious, it isdisplayed as a symbol in a dream, but Daly at the picture carefully to create the effect that he hasa sense of feeling that this is his sense of dreams, is the understanding and interpretation of thedream self. It follows that only the aid of a surreal Dali picture sense of form and visualperformance, is a misreading of Freund’s spiritual differences. We then through Dali’s " Dream" with Don works analysis, both from a sense of the picture, compare various elementsconstituting the dissemination degree, revealing the difference between the two continue todemonstrate the non-Dali "dream."Next,we discuss the difference is this misreading that it created a successful Daly. AnalysisDali " dream " of subjectivity from Dali’s discourse, and this is the objective of the use ofsubjective, is to take the initiative and imitation performance, compared to understand than the real dream, the theme and purpose more clearly, which is different from the real secret dreams,the subconscious is weakened or removed "self " and " superego " and " I" direct rationalexpression. Although this is the description of my direct, but had just experienced war to peoplewho brought amazing. Meet the Breton in the " Surrealist manifesto " in the discussion about theamazing beauty. On behalf of the people of that era pursuit of beauty standards.Finally, from Dali and his childhood experiences with love analyzing the Niagara Dalysuccess. Passing through the influence of their brother’s early artistic influence, his father’schildhood education, analysis doting parents, Dali’s works explore the origin of the imagesconstructed. Combined with nourishing love have become necessary after the success factors ofDalÃ. |