| In recent years, much academic attention of intellectuals, the discourse has been influenced or inspired every generation, promote social development. This study tries to focus in recent years, major social events on the Internet in response to investigate the range of civilian discourse, intellectual discourse between the political discourse over the issue. This article on the Internet in the Field, intellectual discourse generation, transmission, interactive discourse study, obtained the right to intellectual discourse gained unprecedented freedom, their right to speak with the positive and negative performance, while faced enormous challenges .In the drafting of the structure, the first chapter introduces the problem of the origin, from Neijiang "special police were killed and looting corpses" event to start, a brief analysis of Internet users discourse, political discourse and intellectual discourse and the conditions of their respective roles . The second chapter is to sort out a bit of sociology and other social sciences, the intellectual study of literature, examines the evolution of intellectual capacity, and the face of modernity, post modernity and the plight of the crisis. Chapter Three examines the source of intellectual voice, and ancient and modern intellectual discourse right there what kind of changes and features. Second, analysis of the Internet in the Field, intellectuals the right to speak what changes have taken place. Chapter IV of the Internet in the Field of intellectuals positive performance and negative performance challenges. Chapter summary and outlook is the full text of the intellectual discourse of the right to brief the situation was described and analyzed, and how to deal with the challenges pointed out.The specific process of the study, the use of some sites and users of statistics comment, sociological research in the strict sense, the authenticity of the data and voice and representation of the shortfall, but from another perspective , due to manpower, material, financial and time constraints, it is difficult for Internet users behind the strict sense of the surveys and interviews and research, at the same time, because every users on the Internet, see the site statistics and other users comments, which produce an impression, all the attitude towards this sort of herd mentality, in order to produce the same social effects. Therefore, this study is the phenomenon of production, not to dig deeper reasons behind.Combing the literature found that intellectuals have two origins, one Russian, one French, the first intellectuals are those who worry about their livelihood dependent elite, a social conscience, has some knowledge and ideas, social and government those who point out problems, these were not specific career, but a spirit of community. Ancient Western intellectuals for the purpose of seeking the truth is, while China's "person" class, mostly Confucian political ideal "self-cultivation order in the world" as the pursuit. In modern times, with independent personality and does not cling to power, intellectuals, confronted modernity and post-modern system of professional intellectuals in the West, where some theorists "betrayed" or "dead." Voice of intellectuals, with their status in society as the evolution of different change, when his position in the social center, the right has been enhanced and vice versa. Intellectuals in China in recent years from the Periphery to the Centre, and from the center toward the edge of the natural, the right to have undergone such changes.Popularity of the Internet, so that the civilian world to the rise of discourse, on the one hand to break the domination of political discourse, promoting China's democratization process, but the non-rational things are mixed up in, such as paranoid, entertainment, cluster sexual, aggressive, negative and so on.Development of the Internet, so that the right to intellectual discourse more freely than before, in the words of the production, publication, dissemination, communication and feedback on, has undergone tremendous change, in these changes, the intellectual knowledge is a good spread, and enhance a civilian self-consciousness, reduced to dominate the political discourse situation, the use of reason to guide the elite discourse, the sound development of the civilian discourse.However, after the analysis of this view, the results are not so optimistic, intellectual voice hampered by various. First is the question of civilians in all, paranoia and entertaining challenge, followed by intellectuals themselves are "institutionalized", the social division of labor "specialization", representing different interest groups of "populism," "elitist", and their quality and other reasons, been tarnished the purity of discourse, the right to face the challenge.Faced with these challenges, should first complete the Internet in the Field, multi-functional interaction discourse of equality, the establishment of Habermas's public sphere type; second group of intellectuals to their own self, with social responsibility, relative independence, more professional do a good job, "explained who" know how to network and promote good practice. |