The Research On The Test Indicator And Evaluation System Of The Youth Sport Aerobics Test Competition Of The League

The youth sport aerobics test competition was officially operated as the qualification game of the league in 2008, and the problems of the core which is the test indicator and evaluation system, have gradually appeared in the execution process. In the time that the competition aerobics is rising in our country, researching the test indicator and evaluation system of the youth sport aerobics test competition will be able to guide the training of the basic level aerobics in our country, bringing the aerobics and its competitions in our country to develop in a continuous and healthy direction.With methods including surveys, expert interview, reference information, mathematical statistics, etc, starting from the overall structure of the test indicator and evaluation system of the youth sport aerobics test competition, statistical comparison is carried out on four indicators, body appearance, event specific fitness, event specific skills and overall evaluation respectively, as well as the implementation effect of the evaluation proportion. The contents and evaluation standard of every indicator is scientifically proven with the research on how to perfect the test indicator and evaluation system of the youth sport aerobics test competition.The conclusion of the research is listed below:1)The test indicators of the youth sport aerobics consist of four indicators which are body appearance, event specific fitness, event specific skills and overall evaluation. The overall evaluation and evaluation system are fairly reasonable with a high pass rate. Whether the body appearance indicator should be removed or stay and the proportion of each level one indicator are questioned.The sexual and group difference and the percentage position of the overall indicator evaluation require urgent improvements. 2)The body appearance indicator was quantitatively evaluated and relatively objective in 2008. There was a lack of indicators to show the weight and height of athletes. The evaluation standard did not differentiate the sexual and group difference. The percentage set was too high and the overall score was fairly low. The rationality and necessity of this indicator has been very controversial. However, the body appearance indicator is important and necessary. Simplifying the fitness indicator, adding functionality indicators, resetting the percentage of the standards and building large database with long term tracking and investigation, are strong measures to perfect the existing indicators.3)The event specific fitness indicator and evaluation of the two test competitions are basically reasonable. However, the factors of endurance and agility are less involved in comparison, lacking the overall evaluation indicator. The overall score is too high. The average score of the 10 meter shuttle run is almost 100 with the difficulty too low and poor gradient. Improving the route, raising the standard of the perfect score and regulating the execution process will increase the rationality continuously.4)The evaluation content and standard of the event specific skill indicator are developed based on the rule, with the highest rationality and satisfaction in all four standards. Improving the difficulty test method of each age group and clarifying the conversion process of the evaluation result will improve the event specific skill factor further.5) In 2009 overall movement evaluation standards, set A movement was cancelled. The evaluation standard was basically reasonable with high satisfaction. The proportion of the indicators, movement content and completing evaluation indicator had fairly large changes. The overall score was low because of using "movement score * difficulty score" as the score calculation method. To fix the test and evaluation standard, using "(movement score+difficulty score)/2" to calculate the score improves the rationality.6) The overall indicator weight coefficients of two test competitions only contains level one indicator index and the indicator has a large volatility and lack of mathematical basis. Through expert weighting and discussions, the four indicators of body appearance, event specific fitness, event specific skills and overall evaluation have been weighted respectively based on the age groups and the weight coefficients have been reset, adding mathematical basis.