| In recent years, China's expressway construction has entered a period of rapid growth. After China launched investment plan of four trillion in government-led, the highway construction will be warming up. In this context, the contracts disputes of highway construction are increasing. The content of highway construction project contract disputes are complex. The article analyzed highway construction project contract disputes because of project change, elaborated the meaning of engineering change contract disputes, analyzed the causes of disputes, and address legal measures to solve the problems and to protect national infrastructure projects on schedule. This thesis consists of four parts to discuss legal measures of the highway construction contract change.Chapterâ… , the first chapter put forward questions. Nowadays, the numbers of highway construction contract disputes are increasing, and the engineering change is one of the most important aspects of disputes, but it lacks of unified settlement mechanism for disputes. This article hopes to work on analysis of theories of highway construction contract disputes and practice to provide a reasonable, legal, unified settlement mechanism to solve the problem.Chapterâ…¡, the interpretation and scope of highway engineering change disputes. This chapter limits the scope of the study and elaborated numerous disputes, huge number money between the owner and contractor, defines the meaning to analyze and solve problems of engineering change.Chapterâ…¢, the causes of disputes and the current litigation settlement mechanism. This chapter defines the causes of disputes, and summarizes two types of dispute handling mechanisms of the changes in judicial practice, analysis of the shortcomings of the two types of processing mechanism, and thus leads to unified resolution mechanisms change in practice and theory.Chapterâ…£, the theory analyze of highway construction contract engineering change. Focus changes from the contract theory, theory of change of circumstance and foreign legislative experience in areas such as analysis, negated the principle of identification and change of circumstances in dealing with changes in the applicable dispute.Chapter V, based on the above analysis, proposed legal dispute system design to project and solve. |