Font Size: a A A

Case Analysis Of Guangzhou Haizhu Qiao Pushing People Case

Posted on:2011-07-17Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y G YuanFull Text:PDF
GTID:2166360305465325Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
First half of 2009, Guangzhou's Haizhu Qiao changes to be a "destination." of bridge jumping.From April 1 to May 21 50 days, actually played with a bridge 12 from the "jump the bridge show." May 21,2009 Chen Fu-Chao, climb Haizhu Qiao to start their own pay talks. Fire, traffic police rushed to the scene. Traffic police on the implementation of a two-way traffic Haizhu Qiao closed. Fire negotiators began a dialogue with Chen Fu-Chao, to discuss ways to resolve. As Chen Fu-Chao did not meet the requirements, traffic was forced to block the 5 hours. Then 61-year-old Lai Jiansheng to climb the bridge, will be pushed Chen Fu-Chao, those who caused the bridge fell in the fire jumping cushion, there is no danger, but the right vertebral fracture and supracondylar fractures. As a very special case, the old man's decisive shot, triggering sharply divided, people praise the old man "well done", some said the old man is simply murder. Who had no intention to commit suicide jumping off the Bridge, but got injured, and the Guangzhou police on suspicion of gathering people to disturb public order offenses on the hop over the bridge Chen Fu-Chao, criminal detention. The Lai Jiansheng nothing to do with their own things shot, although the traffic problem solved for the time being, but may be held legally responsible. This event attracted wide attention in society, newspapers, Internet and television have reported the matter, and in-depth analysis and discussion, the experts, scholars and other legal staff also put forward their own point of view.This article is divided into a three parts. The first part of the problem, pushing people in Guangzhou Haizhu Qiao course of events and the main debate on this incident. The second part is the people pushing the legal analysis of event-related issues. This section is divided into three parts:a push on the behavior depends on the legal characterization. Lai certain whether the conduct alleged crime, constitutes a Samaritan; Chen Fu-Chao jump bridge pay talks whether the conduct alleged gathering crowds to disturb public places order and crime, and how Fu-super-punishment issue; Rights on the show jumping from the Bridge and the reasons for the deep thinking activist. The third part solution to the problem. By legal analysis, on the push of a human case of Lai and Chen Fu Chao conduct legal classification. Show jumping from the Bridge to contain the corresponding letters on a good system. From this incident, we found that on a good Samaritan of the legal system. Through analysis and study of Samaritan Law, I believe that society does not need special legislation, but in other ways to protect the Samaritan. First, strengthen and improve the Samaritan-related incentives and security system. Second, Appeal to the community support the Samaritan Foundation, the perfect Samaritan civil relief system. Third, the local government to speed up legislation and codification of the Samaritan. Fourth, to strengthen their capacity building, strengthening of the Samaritan's protection.
Keywords/Search Tags:Haizhu Qiao pushing people Event, intentional damage, behaving righteously, improving Legislation
PDF Full Text Request
Related items