Audio And Video-Recording Study

Audio and video recording, can be divided into two parts, namely, synchronized audio and video synchronization. the use of Audio and video recording in court proceedings can be roughly divided into four categories: live audio and video recording, testing of audio and video recording, audio and video recording to identify and monitor the audio and video recording. If not specified, audio and video recording appears below, refer to the criminal investigation, At the investigation stage, the interrogation is conducted in secret, only the investigation organs and the suspects, without external supervision, and many people suspect is in custody without free status, the rights of criminal suspects was neglected. So the use of audio and video recording can reform and improve the audio and video recording system, and questioned the investigation extended to all activities, to enhance the protection of human rights of criminal suspects, the main thrust of this study are located. The full text is divided into six chapters, about 42,000 words.Chapterâ… talked about the legal in nature of audio and video recordings . The chapter points out: The reason why the nature of audio and video recording caused so much dispute is of that not defined clearly the concept of audio and video recording synchronization information ~ (tape) and the synchronization of audio and video recording, and many papers mix the two. In fact, the difference between the two is the relationship between form and content. Formally, the tapes belong to a carrier, left on record as questioning. contently, the nature of audio and video recording is dynamic, it will be proved in accordance with the purpose of change.The second chapter analyzes the value of the system. Under the existing mode of action, audio and video recording has far-reaching impact on the trial; from the litigation stage, it is not only regulate the activities of the Investigation and Interrogation, also a more rigorous regulatory mode. Of the proceedings, the value of the system can be summarized as "two prevent .three ensure and three promote."Chapter Three is the evidence analysis of audio and video recording system. First of all, this chapter inspected the Two Legal Categories, and based on this assessment, pointing out that the vast country look it as a documentary evidence, but also some countries, treat it as evidence. Secondly, this chapter demonstrated that the audio and video recording with the admissibility of hearsay evidence of conflict of rules, with the best evidence of conflict of rules, two rules of evidence in our existing legislation and judicial practice have been recognized.Chapter Four talked about the international legislation and assessment. Examined the United Kingdom as the birthplace of audio and video recording, according to the 1984 "Police and Criminal Evidence Act" and the provisions of the Code E, the police interrogation of suspects, whether or not carried out at the police station, are to implement the entire recording. The United States of sound recordings, films are in different states. And in Taiwan and Hong Kong, about the provisions of audio and video recording is also more comprehensive. Taiwan's "Legislative Yuan" (the Committee) states that: the investigation authorities in questioning suspects, the general should be continuous throughout the recording, when necessary, should be continuous full video. Hong Kong established the interrogation system in the 1980s.Chapter Five point out the operation of audio and video recording in our country. While it is important to increase the technical inputs, but all the technologies are to play a role in the system. At present, the main problem lies in the operation: the scope of application of audio and video recording are unclear, and the lack of neutrality of the main recording, the lack of interoperability and so on, these problems, if not resolved, this system will not be as imaginary as to play its due role, but merely as a display.Chapter Six discussed the consummate of audio and video recording. From the legislative level to build the system and related aspects to improve the program. From the legislative level, must first clear the legal nature of audio and video recording. of the related aspects of the audio-visual materials, we Should regulate the scope of application of audio and video recording. This chapter should consider questioning the presence of a lawyer to establish the right to exclude illegal evidence, and the police to testify in court in order to really achieve on the detection of changes in examination system to promote the audio and video recording system and the function .