The Limits And Coordination Between State Power And Social Power

Power, is inherent in human society, with the development of human society, showing a different form of expression. When State produced, state power is the highest form of power; a strong state power overwhelmed the original powers of society, that's social power. In the long following period of time, there is a high degree of integration of state and society. But with the development of social history, the assimilation situation of the state and society can not meet the good development of the economic society; social concepts are gradually differentiated from the state. This text is based on the theory of the State and Society, the street office and the neighborhood stand for the state power and social power, and explore the limits and coordination of the state power and social power. The text consists of five parts.The first part is the basic theory of the State and Society. The distinctive idea of "State" and "Society" lasts a long time, but Hegel is the first person who real makes a rational distinction between "(public) society" as a political concept and "state". Hegel believes that civil society is the socio-economic field, the system is needed, and it must be managed and shaped the civil society by the police, the guild and civilian authorities. If the state decided to the society, only the state can effectively overcome and relieve the inherent shortcomings of civil society with the needed described system to analyze the relationship between state and society. Marx developed Hegel's theory of civil society, proposed a universal basic concept for "society". Society's internal struggle is the driving force of its historical development; the State is the concentrated form of society, society, the real activist, is a prerequisite of the state. Election which links society and the state is as a real struggle part that the community tried to conquer the political power, which is the most important political interests with the voice of the revolution.The second part mainly explored the boundaries and the historical development of the state power and social power on the basis of the typical representative of the state power and Social power. State power began to alienation from the rapid development of social power to the sea of state power. The reason is due to inertia by the impact of the traditional planned economy, China's government does not effectively adapt to development of the situation and transform its functions, and establish the concept of service to the community, but with the impact of the traditional "Strong government, big government", it has been reluctant to withdraw their autonomy originally belonged to the field of society and form the administrative client of social organization, the neighborhood is the typical representative. The third part introduced the current status and issues of the street office and the neighborhood. After reform and opening up, the market economy system has been gradually established, market's participation request to develop political system from authoritarian to democratic cooperation, and market play an important role in allocation resources of the power. However, the current status of the street office and the neighborhood is that the street office control the personnel office, finance and autonomy of the neighborhood, social power has been severely crushed and dysphasia, which is contrary to the principle of limited government in modern society, so clearing the limits of government action and social scope of autonomy is particularly important.The fourth part renewed the functional relation between the street office and the neighborhood. The action of the state power ended in the edge of the social autonomy, and determine the action edge of the street office and the neighborhood's autonomy. With the impact of the traditional factor, we did not separate ourselves from the government's leadership completely and feel free to develop the civil society organization, but with the guiding effect of the government, we insist on the democratic autonomous principle and market participating principle, depending on the market to divide the inertia of the power, and relying the development of the market to coordinate the action of the power.The fifth part expressed that division of the boundaries between the state and the society is not the purpose, the distinction of functions between the state and the society is to better coordination. In the community building we must improve neighborhood's the design of related systems, and construct the mechanisms for community participation, as to the street office, the nurturing and development of community intermediary organizations is to form a healthy development system environment, providing financial support and assistance to bear the social and public affairs that separate the street from the neighborhood and no ability to bear, and giving full play to its "lubricant" role.