| Parole is an important criminal punishment method, which is designed for the purpose of accelerating criminals rehabilitating, realizing judicial remedy, establishing bridges for criminals'resocialization, relieving prison pressure, economizing execution costs. Utilized properly, the Parole system would play an active role to protect the human rights of criminals and achieve the objectives of penalties.However, due to insufficiency in the provisions of both substantive and procedural laws with regard to the Parole system, it has not been appropriately used in judicial practices, resulting in many problems pertaining thereto. For quite a long time, professionals in both legal theoretical area and practical area have been paying lots of attention to it.The author is a policeman working in prisons doing penalty execution, who is trying to find out the existing problems and insufficiencies in every step of the practices of this system by way of statistics on the application, as well as questionnaires and interviews. Based on the aforesaid, the author posed his own conceptualization in respect to amending the provisions of the substantive conditions of parole on legislative level, distinguishing between two situations called"should be paroled"and"could be paroled",detailing the provisions of the revocation conditions of parole and perfecting the mechanisms for the application of parole ,appraisal of the prisoners'behaviors during the term of imprisonment as well as the supervision and investigation of the prisoners'performance during the probation period for parole . |
