| In the twenties of 20th century, there are many different apprehensions on the social necessary labor-time in Soviet. The same situation emerged in the original time of new China. Since fifties of 20th century, five great contests were outburst, and there no apparent sign to end it. At present, the view on the social necessary labor-time can be divided into two categories. A view can be defined as one-category-view which believe that only one meaning on the social necessary labor-time; the another advocate that the social necessary labor-time is not limited to one meaning, on the contrary, it has several different meanings including classifying two categories, three categories and four categories. Even someone consider the social necessary labor-time is not several meanings, but its own can be classified into two kinds or four kinds. Someone points out the views that classified the social necessary labor-time meaning into one or several and considered different kinds of the social necessary labor-time being both are error, the social necessary labor-time was constructed to a meaning and three layers which is different aspects in a integrated things. These views can induce to no-one-category-view. The objective reason of the divergence is that the arguments of the social necessary labor-time by Marx are varied. Sometimes the social necessary labor-time defined by Marx means the necessary time for single production, or for the whole production; the social necessary labor-time also means the time for reproduction, for original production and presenting production, etc. To some extent, the social necessary labor-time is considered as several meanings and kinds. This is the base of the engendering of no-one-category-view. The word of the social necessary labor-time possesses the mixed meaning. It can be regarded as the necessary time for single production, or for reproduction; the even time for production, or the time to satisfy the scope of production; the obligatory time for production, or required time for production. Even Marx himself didn't avoid the mixed meaning. It is another base of the engendering of no-one-category-view. The connotation stated byMarx in different place is coincident. There is only one the social necessary labor-time after all. The subjective reason of divergence including: 1) Low sight spot. People partially comprehend and are difficult to grasp the whole variation of the statement on the social necessary labor-time. 2) Metaphysical approach. The researcher can't consider the social necessary labor-time as a varied and diversified integration. 3) Non-Marxist approach to read on capital. It limits the sight of researcher, who can't think the arguments of Marx is developing, only stopping on a still thought. Marx didn't give the social necessary labor-time different meaning from strict study style, responsible spirits, historic duties, arguing method. Precisely mastering the meaning of the social necessary labor-time should exert dialectic approach on the new height and sight, which can show that the social necessary labor-time is the assigned labor time to satisfy the demands for production under the condition of presenting normal production and reproduction. No matter how merchandize the production, the time which is needed by society all can be allocated to the social necessary labor-time. According to the principle of the same satisfactory degree on each production, society assigns the social necessary labor-time in the social labor time available. The significance of recognizing the social necessary labor-time is that it is use to ending the contests on the social necessary labor-time, mastering and improving Marxism theoretically, to interpreting the puzzle in life, indicating the value and price of production and serves, which including monopolistic production, non-marker production, the action of official and the employee in enterprise and facilities. It also benefits to propelling liberation of woman and the healthy development of society. |