| When dispute occurs in the performance of a contract for the international sale of goods, the problem that which legal norm should be adopted to resolve the dispute will be drawn at the same time, that is the issue of legal appliance of contract for the international sale of goods. To solve this problem, by party autonomy, parties may set various national law, foreign law, international convention or international practice which they think are of benefit to themselves the most to resolve dispute when signing the contract. Another resolution is that courts or arbitration organizations may select the most suitable law if parties have no agreement in this aspect. Since legal norms are different from each other, the selection of different legal norms may cause different results. "United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods", "Principles of International Commercial Contracts", our country's " Law of Contract" is the representations of international convention, international practice and the domestic law of our country. This paper compares the similarity and difference about scope of appliance, formation, manner, explanation, performance, non-performance and validity of the contract among the above 3 rules of law and make a judgement to these 3 rules of law. It is expected to supply advice to parties, courts, arbitration organizations to select relative laws. |