| Fainess is a social and historical conception, There is no absolute idea on fair distribution or model of fair distribution. Fair distribution holds different connotations in different phases of social development and different countries of economic system. As people compare, analyze measure and evaluate such situations as their income, connections, political status and power, they often have their own stands, view points, methods and standards. Therefore, fair distribution is always a contentions question. The research on the theory of fair distribution will base on the fair distribution of income in the sphere of economy, concern widely politics, sociology, ethnics and other scopes, and analyze and probe into the question on the theory of fair distribution completely and synthetically.This essay covers three parts according to the research method of history and logic being consistent, positivist analysis and regulational research connected. The first part investigates the history, it mainly probes into the evolution of western fair distribution theory and Marxist fair distribution theory from the angle of history, the drawn experiments and lessons can supply us the guidance of theory in modern Chinese distribution. The second part explains the reality. According to the method of positivist analysis and regulational reason connected, based on positivist analysis upon modem distribution situation, this part accepts value justice, i. e. imbalance has appeared as a whole in modem distribution, and it also explains the reasons. The third part concerns the construction of value frame. Based on the first two parts, by comparrning the discussion on fairness and efficiency in modem China, this question should be analyzed from two aspects, one is about the relation between fairness and efficiency, it is our point of view that society should give priority to fairness and order, i. e. take farness as social value orientation. The other is about the relation between equality and efficiency, according to modern Chinese social situations the principle æºfficiency first, equality considered is acceptable. The question is how to guarantee the adaptive degree of the two aspects. |