Font Size: a A A

Comparison Of 《Chinese History Research Methodology》 And 《Supplement Of Chinese History Research Methodology》

Posted on:2010-10-24Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:F L XuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2155360278951188Subject:Historical philology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
<> and <> are Liang qichao`s most important theory and methodology of historical literature. This writing is simple compare the different aspects of the two books from the writing style, viewpoints, methodology and content. Two books are sorting after the speech in college. The former mainly means the history significance, objective and scope of more ambitious history theory, While the latter one is speak more specific, meticulous, mainly about the historical methodology. It show that "capricious" character in the point of history theory. It is observed that <> is append the primary investigation of methodology, it is the precursor of theory.But <> is about practical methods, perfectical and sublimational of the theory to create formation of the Liang qichao's own historical theory system. In these two books , Liang qichao`s experience with history is still has high values, so the two books are more versions and more widely circulated.
Keywords/Search Tags:Liang qichao, history, methodology, compare
PDF Full Text Request
Related items